Bleach Bleach Omake Files
- Thread starter Innortal
- Start date
Don't get me wrong, I'm not implying that you shouldn't write whatever you want to. Just that I didn't like it and to me all of it came across as if you ignored all logic and previously established characterization "just 'cause".
Writing based entirely on whatever pops into your head is the reason their are so many badly written yaoi fics littering the internet (which is fine as long as your not against them).
Writing based entirely on whatever pops into your head is the reason their are so many badly written yaoi fics littering the internet (which is fine as long as your not against them).
:headbanger: :headbanger: :headbanger: :headbanger: :headbanger:
dude (at least i assume so) this is crack, one of the defining characteristics of crack is that the normal logic that would be present in a normal fic gets thrown out the window.
it doesn't matter that this would never ever realistically happen in canon or on a normal fic. all that matters is that it is funny (which it is)
dude (at least i assume so) this is crack, one of the defining characteristics of crack is that the normal logic that would be present in a normal fic gets thrown out the window.
it doesn't matter that this would never ever realistically happen in canon or on a normal fic. all that matters is that it is funny (which it is)
Eh. Not my brand of humor. I can see where it is but I do believe that your other writings have more merit Innortal. I can say it was well written as I have come to expect from you, just I think you went in a direct that you seem uncomfortable writing. Or it could just be me.
As for you Amod. Yes you did declare it wasn't crack by suggesting that Innortal shouldn't be ignoring all logic and personalities splayed out just cause he wants to. I'm sorry but that's the very definition of crack. So stating that means you denied it being crack.
Add to that the fact your initial response was one word, a very condescending word might I add, constitutes your lack of constructive critism.
If you wish to prove me wrong, answer me this. In what way have what you said given Innortal any insight into what he could do better.
My word, if you wish to make an argument at least learn the proper way to justify yourself. If you are arguing a point try not to have posted contridicting evidence only two posts before. I don't care if you argue against it being crack, which is entirely possible if you wish to, but you can't argue both sides of the issue, it just doesn't work.
As for you Amod. Yes you did declare it wasn't crack by suggesting that Innortal shouldn't be ignoring all logic and personalities splayed out just cause he wants to. I'm sorry but that's the very definition of crack. So stating that means you denied it being crack.
Add to that the fact your initial response was one word, a very condescending word might I add, constitutes your lack of constructive critism.
If you wish to prove me wrong, answer me this. In what way have what you said given Innortal any insight into what he could do better.
My word, if you wish to make an argument at least learn the proper way to justify yourself. If you are arguing a point try not to have posted contridicting evidence only two posts before. I don't care if you argue against it being crack, which is entirely possible if you wish to, but you can't argue both sides of the issue, it just doesn't work.
