Filraen said:
I use notepad++ because of being lightweight and good for data manipulation. On what parts Textpad is better?
I forgot about your post, what with everything happening on this forum and the thread having been moved.
Keep in mind all the below is merely my opinion, but I've used Textpad, for some 14 years (1999), and Notepad++ for I think about 4 (around 2009).
Notepad++, when equipped with the Light Explorer, the Window Manager, and the Spell Checker plugins and the Spell libraries, matches Texpad almost feature for feature. Both are *very* capable programs for the size, and in some ways I consider them better than word processors.
They are fast, generally trouble free, can work on large number of files easily. They can double as IDE program language editing environments. Feature for feature, they match fairly well, one may do something slightly different, but it is likely there. From a standard user standpoint, I've got them both configured to be so close to each other I can barely tell which one I am in.
But Textpad and Notepad++ diverge on 3 very critical points I've come across, and 1 minor point, and it is why I use both.
1. Notepad++ can handle international and Unicode far better than Textpad. This is one of the few true boneheaded failings of the people at Helios that put out Textpad. The Textpad forums and community have been asking for proper support for years... and despite the fact Textpad is far older than Notepad++, despite the constant demands, it does not properly support this.
2. Textpad is far better at sorting. Yes, Notepad++ has a sort, you can even sort on specific column. Compared to Textpad it is in comparison a pain to use, and not nearly as flexible. Textpad allows block or normal sort, and the one gives you three ranges of columns to sort on.
3. Textpad is better at block operations. Note that I do not mean standard copy/paste, on that they are near the same. I mean *block mode* editing. Notepad++ must be constantly turned on for each use, or use an awkward Alt-Key that tends to disengage very easily. Textpad allows you to toggle it on and off if desired, even midstream. Thus everything is the same between the two modes as far as keyboard shortcuts and expected movement functionality. Sorting is context sensitive based on mode. To me at least, this is superior by far and more intuitive.
4. The minor point is the spell checker in Textpad is more versatile and stable, I think that is due to it being completely built in, rather than relying on a plug in and a 3rd party install. I've never been able to really add to the Notepad++ dictionary, and the Ignore All button has never worked for me in any version I've tried since I started using it.
One thing I've not checked, as I use it in Textpad so rarely, is what capability Notepad++ has for macros... Can't say if better or worse, but that is the one big area I've not needed to explore.
Hope that was helpful and informative.