Rising Dragon said:
Amaranth said:
Never said it was. The Arc en Ciel and Augusto are completely different weapons. I'm talking about a previous run in they had where a TSAB fleet Arc en Ciel'ed them into oblivion and then it turns out they didn't.
First I've ever heard of this. Got a source?
Not until I reread Force and check. I do remember talk about the Huckebein and that they had been close to getting to them, but something happened and they didn't.
Amaranth said:
Rising Dragon said:
Where is it said that the Augusto cannon is an Arc-en-Ciel? The Arc-en-Ciel doesn't not come off as a weapon that could come off as miniaturized for safe usage, because the Arc-en-Ciel isn't your run-of-the-mill beam cannon. The projectile rips open an unstable rift in the dimension, and causes catastrophic damage upon collapsing back in on itself. Catastrophic enough where standard procedure is for the warship that uses it to immediately teleport to a safe distance upon firing it, which did NOT happen with the Wolfram.
The Augusto Cannon is far more likely to be like the weapons fielded by Chrono's fleet when they destroyed the Saint's Cradle.
I think people blow it out of proportions. They were willing to use it on the Book of Darkness' defense program, which was stationed a few kilometers from Uminari. Something tells me it's less the world ending gamma ray burst or Roland Emmerich Yellowstone Caldera nuke people are making it out to be and is more like rolling Tsar Bomba, original ordinance out.
That said, I'd wager Chrono was not fielding Augusto cannons either. The Augusto seemed more like high caliber magical ordinance than what Chrono was using when he blew the Saint's Cradle apart.
The one scene we have of the Augusto firing in the manga shows your atypical magical beam, and it matches up with the weapons fired by Chrono's fleet. Until we get a source claiming otherwise, we might as well consider the weapons used by the Claudia and the Wolfram the one and the same.
As far as the Arc-en-Ciel is concerned, no, it's not a world-ending weapon, but what we do know is that it blast radius of its function has an effective range of 100 kilometers, so it's still extremely destructive when used in-atmosphere. The requirement to teleport to safety after firing isn't an exaggeration either; that was listed in the supplemental materials and demonstrated in A's proper both times it was used.
[/quote]
I know it's still one big uber nuke. But, depending on the kind of blast radius we're referring to, the Arc en Ciel could go from being 50, to just 2 full powered Tsar Bombas (it's blast radius goes from 1.88 miles to up to 47 miles).
Of course, I'm assuming that they are firing so that the crust won't be affected. If the cannon is really that precise, they should be able to adjust it so as to not impact the crust.
You see, the problem is that the Arc is not a thermonuclear weapon, but would lean more towards "antimatter" cannon because everything within an specific range is annihilated regardless of what's inside, whereas a nuke detonated in the same circumstances would meet resistance from the Earth's crust and the water, the Arc en Ciel would simply swallow it all.
Plus, I doubt the TSAB wants to be responsible for putting an entire world in jeopardy... That or they can control the output and form over which is fired (which, given how magic seems to work, seems likely).
Tennie said:
Rising Dragon said:
As far as the Arc-en-Ciel is concerned, no, it's not a world-ending weapon, but what we do know is that it blast radius of its function has an effective range of 100 kilometers, so it's still extremely destructive when used in-atmosphere. The requirement to teleport to safety after firing isn't an exaggeration either; that was listed in the supplemental materials and demonstrated in A's proper both times it was used.
Well, keep in mind that the crust of the Earth, at its thickest point (underneath the Tibetan Plateau and the Himalayan Mountains to its immediate south) is "only" about 70 kilometers or so. So if one were to detonate an Arc-en-Ciel on top of Mount Everest (or anywhere else on Earth, for that matter), you'll expose the mantle immediately underneath. One can only guess as to what kinds of effects that it'll have on the Earth's surface and all that live on it!:jawdrop:
If detonated in land. On the sea, the water would rush in to fill things in. It would still have devastating consequences for the immediacies surrounding the Sea of Japan, but the impact wouldn't be as catastrophic as we think.
Unless the blast radius really was fully spherical regardless (in which case, then Asia and much of the Pacific would be in deep shit), and I have my doubts about it.[/quote]