Previous and Next buttons?

[Jorlem]

Would it be possible to add previous and next page buttons, in addition to the first and last buttons?

 

[locke69]

Hmm? I really don't get what you're asking for, but either way, what you see is what you get for vanilla Invisionfree forums. Things can be added, but they have to be within a limited realm.

 

[spooky316]

And odds are it probably won't happen anyway, since Hawk's disappeared beyond the rim.

 

[Takerial]

So instead of just clicking the next page number or previous page number, you want there to be previous and next buttons?

Really?

Seriously?

 

[Jorlem]

Eh, I thought it couldn't hurt to ask. I'm fine with the way it is now when I'm using my computer, but I keep hitting the wrong page numbers when I use my ipod. Sorry for bothering you.

 

[zeebee1]

Either way, it isn't going tio happen.

 

[Azrael]

If Hawk adds anything it should be a working search function... <_<

 

[Mercsenary]

If Hawk adds anything it should be a working search function... <_<

:sisi:

This. This a many times.

 

[Mick]

An ignore feature could be nice too.

 

[PCHeintz72]

An ignore feature could be nice too.

An ignore for what?

 

[SimmyC]

It's an ability to ignore a certain poster. So let's say, someone you find annoying replies to your thread, or a thread you read to. Press ignore, you'll never see his post. You probably still see replies to that person of course, but you yourself won't see the ignored one's reply.

That being said, haven't been to many forums that have that option, or if they do, ever used it myself.

 

[PCHeintz72]

It's an ability to ignore a certain poster. So let's say, someone you find annoying replies to your thread, or a thread you read to. Press ignore, you'll never see his post. You probably still see replies to that person of course, but you yourself won't see the ignored one's reply.

That being said, haven't been to many forums that have that option, or if they do, ever used it myself.

I've seen that once or twice on forums... always stuck as a bad option.

 

[Azrael]

Search. That is all this forum needs atm. No frivolous extras. We need a functioning search option. :no:

 

[Juubi]

Search. That is all this forum needs atm. No frivolous extras. We need a functioning search option. :no:

I agree with this. Though it would probably make it easier for necromancers to find and revive certain threads that were better off dead.

 

[PCHeintz72]

Search. That is all this forum needs atm. No frivolous extras. We need a functioning search option.? :no:

I agree with this. Though it would probably make it easier for necromancers to find and revive certain threads that were better off dead.

While for sure some threads qualify for that... There are also those that popular opinion would rather keep updated.

IMO part of the problem also is a lot of authors are using this as a full blown archival system, instead of posting to archive accounts like FF.NET or personal pages. And no, that statement is not leveled at any specific author or even just this forum.

Other forums have this same issue.

Hawk has gone on record stating that is not what this forum is supposed to be for.

I currently have some 78 direct links to threads on this forum alone, though some few of those are not to stories, but to specific topics, the bulk are to stories.

I have some to Be Your True Mind, and some to Shinji's Sharing still... Fukufics and Zorch's as well.