Harry Potter Questions of canon events...

da_fox2279

California Crackpot
Apparently, since 'Voldemort' is French for flight from death, the silent t is supposed to be obvious (according to some French speakers).
 
da_fox2279 said:
Apparently, since 'Voldemort' is French for flight from death, the silent t is supposed to be obvious (according to some French speakers).
It was probably intentionally bastardized to allude to the French term while not actually sounding exactly like it. It's a pretty common literary trick concerning names.
 

Deathwings

Well-Known Member
da_fox2279 said:
Apparently, since 'Voldemort' is French for flight from death, the silent t is supposed to be obvious (according to some French speakers).
Flight OF Death. Not "from", "OF". And I can confirm the obviousness of the silent t for me.
 

alucard964

Well-Known Member
according to babelfish it is flight from death. the best i can find is vol du mort which is flight of the dead.
 
I blame Hagrid. He usually drops his 't' endings...

‘Well – I don’ like sayin’ the name if I can help it...

But in this case...

‘Nah – can’ spell it. All righ' – Voldemort.’ Hagrid shuddered.

‘Don’ make me say it again.' - and he never did!

Well, if he can't even spell it, I'm not surprised he can't pronounce it, especially since he's never heard it spoken for forty years [edit, make that fifty!] - no one has. After that, one of the few people to say the name was Harry who got it from Hagrid. 

Next thing you know, we won't be able to pronounce the T at the end of You-Know-Whoot.
 

Deathwings

Well-Known Member
alucard964 said:
according to babelfish it is flight from death. the best i can find is vol du mort which is flight of the dead.
Dude, I AM French. I'd like to think that I know my own fucking language.
 

alucard964

Well-Known Member
Deathwings said:
da_fox2279 said:
Apparently, since 'Voldemort' is French for flight from death, the silent t is supposed to be obvious (according to some French speakers).
Flight OF Death. Not "from", "OF". And I can confirm the obviousness of the silent t for me.
Deathwings said:
alucard964 said:
according to babelfish it is flight from death. the best i can find is vol du mort which is flight of the dead.
Dude, I AM French. I'd like to think that I know my own fucking language.
No need to be rude.
 

Shirotsume

Not The Goddamn @dmin
Then maybe don't try to condescendingly- and incorrectly- correct a guy about his own mother tongue?
 

alucard964

Well-Known Member
Shirotsume said:
Then maybe don't try to condescendingly- and incorrectly- correct a guy about his own mother tongue?

I had no clue that he was french. I don't usually look profiles of the people posting and that is my fault, but it still was no reason for him to be rude. and i was not trying to be condescending with my reply i looked up a couple of different translations and they all said basically the same thing. Google translate said death flight while babelfish said flight from death.
 

MTing

Well-Known Member
This brings up a great question. How do you think people in the Harry Potter Universe pronounce Voldemort's name?

I mean, if everyone refers to him as "You-Know-Who" and "the Dark Lord", kids aren't going to know how to pronounce his name.

How do people say that name in-universe? You have to consider the fact that almost everyone we saw was British and knew very little French.

Do people even know how to spell out Voldemort's name? The first time we see Voldemort in writing is in Book 2, when Riddle does the floating letters thing. Would people have been spelling it "Voldemor" since it's sounded out that way?
 
alucard964 said:
Shirotsume said:
Then maybe don't try to condescendingly- and incorrectly- correct a guy about his own mother tongue?

I had no clue that he was french. I don't usually look profiles of the people posting and that is my fault, but it still was no reason for him to be rude. and i was not trying to be condescending with my reply i looked up a couple of different translations and they all said basically the same thing. Google translate said death flight while babelfish said flight from death.
 
Could a Parselmouth select a snake as their Secret Keeper for a Fidelius Charm?
 
Good one! Yes, that would be secure. Keep it in the cellar and feed it rats. Nobody would ever get in the building.
 

Shirotsume

Not The Goddamn @dmin
I always wondered... what would happen if you obliviated the secret from your secret-keeper?
 

seitora

Well-Known Member
Who knows, JK would retcon it by the next book anyways

That's what Harry does in Power of Paranoia
 

da_fox2279

California Crackpot
True, and it came back to bite him in the ass. Selecting some random person to be the Secret Keeper is fine in theory, but unless you have some way of keeping in contact/keeping an eye on them, you have no way of knowing when something happens to them. Should they be injured badly enough, you will need a new secret keeper fast, and what happens when you only have a few moments to decide/find one?
 

iiradned

Well-Known Member
JKR has posted the official history the Potter family on the revamped Pottermore.com

https://www.pottermore.com/writing-by-jk-rowling/the-potter-family

JKR writes that the Potter family fortune rested on inventing potions such as Skele-Gro, Pepperup and Sleekeazy’s Hair Potion.
 

seitora

Well-Known Member
I'm not sure if it's supposed to be sad or ironic that Harry, who has hair that many times is referred to as just not capable of staying down, should have a family history involving the creation of a potion that's supposed to tame hair.

There goes like four-fifths of fanfictions down in flames that involve Harry having some sort of super-badass heritage. Kind of odd that it took JK 8 years after the last book to even reveal Harry's grandparents to us, who we now know aren't Charles Potter and Dorea Black.
 

Shirotsume

Not The Goddamn @dmin
Gonna be honest, I really cannot even give the slightest shit for JKR's 'history.'


I've seen much, much better, and I'm sticking with those ones.

Seriously, how piss poor. "Oh hey, let me just make some shit up in 2 minutes to shovel to the masses!"
 

seitora

Well-Known Member
In Book 4, did Peter use Voldemort's wand at the end to kill Cedric? I think he had to in order for that whole prior spell thingie to revive Cedric, but that just seems so incredibly odd that Voldemort would let Peter use something so personal.
 
An interesting question. I went back and re-read the passage. Firstly, I should say that my view is that a story does not need to explain every detail – in fact, shouldn't, for it will distract and slow things down. Stories are meant to be read and enjoyed and logic flaws are only bad if they are extremely obvious when reading for enjoyment. Analysing afterwards and discovering plot holes does not detract from the quality of the literature imo. So, this  is how I would explain what might have happened:

Offstage, Wormtail crouches waiting. Beside him on the ground lie Voldemort's wand, a robe, and  Voldemort's embryonic form. When he hears Harry and Cedric arrive he bundles up Voldemort in the robe, picks up the wand, then moves forward to deal with Harry.

As soon as Harry sees them, his scar hurts so badly he collapses blindly.

Voldemort commands Wormtail to kill Cedric. With Voldemort's wand still in his hand, he does so, then pushes the wand into the bundled robe pocket and lays the bundle down on the ground.

Wormtail now comes forward and uses his own wand to light a wandlight, secure Harry, light the cauldron fire, summon the bone, etc. He drops the naked embryo into the cauldron.

When Voldemort arises fully-formed but naked, he commands Wormtail to robe him, which Wormtail does with the robe from the ground. Voldemort then pulls the wand from the pocket.

At the end of the scene when the spells come out of the wand in reverse order, I believe some minor spells are not directly mentioned such as throwing Wormtail against the tomb, Crucio's etc - though there are several screams from the wand. Then  the metal hand he made for Wormtail comes out first, more screams, and so on back to Cedric's death cast by Wormtail, etc.
 

seitora

Well-Known Member
If Peter did have his own wand, that's weird that he would still use Voldemort's wand then. Especially since the whole 'wands not personally suited to the user' thing was established in like, Book 2 with Ron. I guess Rowling just wanted Cedric to come back with the Priori Incantatem, but that's just still like, weird, man.
 
Yeah, it doesn't make much sense. Most likely it's just a mistake. We know in the first edition she had James coming out the wand before Lily and that was fixed. Probably she originally had Voldemort kill Cedric then much later she thought it would be good to give the command 'kill the spare' to highlight how casual death can be - but she forgot she'd got Cedric popping out the wand later. Or the other way, she had Pettigrew kill Cedric with his own wand then much later she thought it would be cool to have Cedric pop out the wand and ask Harry to take his body back - but she forgot it wasn't Voldy who did the deed.
 
Top