Ranma ½ Ranma and the Olympians

elof

Well-Known Member
#1
I got the idea of Ranma being the son of Typhon and Nodoka. That is the real reason why Ranma's mother agreed to Genma taking Ranma on the training trip. To keep him safe from both monsters and Gods. It could explain the rivalrly between Ryoga with Ryoga being the son of a God. Don't know where in the series timeline of the Percy Jackson bookds it would be for Ranma and the Nerima Wrecking crew to meet the Camp Halfblood heroes. It would be funny to have Kasumi being the favorite daughter of Ares. So what do you guys think? Plausible?
 

007

Well-Known Member
#2
Might need some more fleshing out, but I like the the concept. When might you do it?
 
#3
So Typhon, a vaguely humanoid force of ultimate, elemental, sentient destruction, escapes his god-forged prison to bang a chick... then goes back, resulting in the birth of the entity known as Ranma... the awkward thing is, that's actually a much more logical explanation for Ranma's entire life than either the show or the manga ever even attempted to create. Sounds interesting. I'd read it. Also, Typhon wasn't a god. He was a titan.
 

fitzgerald

Well-Known Member
#4
elof said:
I got the idea of Ranma being the son of Typhon and Nodoka.  That is the real reason why Ranma's mother agreed to Genma taking Ranma on the training trip.  To keep him safe from both monsters and Gods.  It could explain the rivalrly between Ryoga with Ryoga being the son of a God.  Don't know where in the series timeline of the Percy Jackson bookds it would be for Ranma and the Nerima Wrecking crew to meet the Camp Halfblood heroes.  It would be funny to have Kasumi being the favorite daughter of Ares.  So what do you guys think? Plausible?
Another  Genma is not the true father story?


Can I suggest the alternative of Nodoka  ( a relative non entity in the Ranma series) being replaced by a Goddess.    Its much smoother and neatly explains why in the first 1/2 to 2/3 of the manga Ranma's mother in a non entity.
 

zane

Well-Known Member
#5
Must we continue to necro 6 year old threads?
 

Dumbledork

Well-Known Member
#6
Why not? As longs as someone adds something relevant to the thread I don't see a problem.
 
Top