SB banned me; I'm looking for a new forum...

nick012000

Well-Known Member
#51
biigoh said:
<a href='http://s3.zetaboards.com/FanFictionFederation/' target='_blank' rel='nofollow'>http://s3.zetaboards.com/FanFictionFederation/</a>

Are you talking about the Fanfiction Federation? n_n
No, I'm talking about <a href='http://forums.darksidemoon.net/index.php' target='_blank' rel='nofollow'>Dark Side Of The Moon</a>. I was suggesting it because he got banned from SB for NSFW content in his Quest Thread, and given how racy some of the fanfics (re)posted there are, I doubt that it'd be a problem.
 

WizardOne

Well-Known Member
#52
Far too many sub forums on that forum, considering there are like 65 members, there are nearly that many sub forums...

Also, Gundam being one of the three large fic sections? Really?

If I ever move to another forum, Its going to be one like TBL or Spacebattles, where you just have one or two writing sections, and then one or two BROB sections.

Overly specialising subforums is a sign of an over ambitious forum creator.

As is the other issue with that forum, where they have something like 3 admins and a couple of mods to police 65 users.

Also: The main admin is Mike/cherry lover, who is VERY opinionated and ships Sakura, I don't believe that having extremely biased admins is a good idea. ( I can easily see him banning people for writing fics where Sakura gets the short end of the stick) but admittedly I don't know him very well on a personal level.

On the other hand, the forum has no particular objection to lemon/weird content, which gives it a plus in my book. We'll see, I'd much rather if they consolidated some of the forums.
 

nick012000

Well-Known Member
#53
WizardOne said:
As is the other issue with that forum, where they have something like 3 admins and a couple of mods to police 65 users.
To be fair, they're just starting out, and given that it was the three of them that started it, it makes sense that they'd all be admins.

Also: The main admin is Mike/cherry lover, who is VERY opinionated and ships Sakura, I don't believe that having extremely biased admins is a good idea. ( I can easily see him banning people for writing fics where Sakura gets the short end of the stick) but admittedly I don't know him very well on a personal level.
Apparently he hates the abuse of power with a passion, so he says that's not likely to happen. Given how Crying Vegeta has been behaving, and the fact he hasn't been banned yet, I'd have to say that your fears seem unfounded.
 

Prince Charon

Well-Known Member
#54
Just got tempbanned from SB.com, for the first time, ever. Can't even check my inbox to find out why.

Could someone who's registered there and not banned please PM a mod there, so I can find out whether I need to apologise, roll my eyes in exasperation, or appeal due to my account being hacked (I don't know that it was, but it's an potion that occurred to me while typing)?
 

daniel_gudman

KING (In Land of Blind)
Staff member
#55
Doing it.

I copied you to the "conversation" so you should see it... eventually.

EDIT: No, you're not copied on, because copying you threw an error. I'll keep you posted I guess.
 

Mercsenary

Well-Known Member
#56
Prince Charon said:
Just got tempbanned from SB.com, for the first time, ever. Can't even check my inbox to find out why.

Could someone who's registered there and not banned please PM a mod there, so I can find out whether I need to apologise, roll my eyes in exasperation, or appeal due to my account being hacked (I don't know that it was, but it's an potion that occurred to me while typing)?
Dude that is weird. According to Xenforo your last post was in November. Of 2012.

Looks more like you got hacked or something.
 

daniel_gudman

KING (In Land of Blind)
Staff member
#57
<a href='http://forums.spacebattles.com/threads/harry-potter-discussion-ideas-recs-4.218615/page-176#post-9805560' target='_blank' rel='nofollow'>Here's why</a>.
 
#58
daniel_gudman said:
<a href='http://forums.spacebattles.com/threads/harry-potter-discussion-ideas-recs-4.218615/page-176#post-9805560' target='_blank' rel='nofollow'>Here's why</a>.
Ah yeah. I remember seeing that idea. It was indeed fucked up. Not sure if it's worthy of a ban though.
 

daniel_gudman

KING (In Land of Blind)
Staff member
#59
Well it made a mod uncomfortable and that's all it takes at Space Battles, so there you go.
 
#60
daniel_gudman said:
Well it made a mod uncomfortable and that's all it takes at Space Battles, so there you go.
Well we might as well post Charon's full idea to be fair though.

A concept appeared in my head, and kept hopping around:

Firstly, for purposes of this idea, the reason magical training starts when it does (whether the canon age of eleven, or some later date, like thirteen or sixteen), is because that's when most wizards and witches can control their magic well enough to get consistent results from a wand. Late bloomers might be mistaken for squibs (if the parents or guardians don't go bug Dumbledore to check the Hogwarts Book), while early bloomers often experiment with wandless magic, as young Tom Riddle did (see Book 6). Hermione is probably an early bloomer, magically speaking, in the setting of this idea:

When Hagrid goes to get Harry, he introduces him to a girl on a leash, whom Hagrid calls 'Ermione, and says is going to be Harry's guide and servant due to having been raised in the muggle world, but also having lived a few years in the wizarding world. When Harry sees (or perhaps touches) the crest on her collar, he gets a feeling similar to the one he gets when he first holds his wand, and when he asks about the collar and leash, Hagrid explains that the leash is just to show who's responsible for her, while the collar keeps her under control, and connects her to her Master (Harry). Hagrid looks on her fondly, like one of his 'interesting creatures' (well, she's probably less dangerous than a dragon, at least), but reluctantly admits that she killed three people, even if it wasn't her fault.

Hermione shyly-but-unashamedly explains that she was running an experiment, and it went a little wrong. The idea ended at that point, but kept repeating with minor variations. Her parents might have been two of the three people who died. She may or may not be sociopathic or evil enough for keeping her collared to be the best thing for all concerned. It rather depends on whether or not you want to do a 'tear down the wizarding world' story from this.

Having Hogwarts start a few years later would give Harry time at Stonewall, away from Dudley, and would give Hermione more time to grow into the scary person in the idea.

'Servant' might or might not mean 'slave', it's up to the writer.
 

biigoh

Well-Known Member
#61
And the conversation went over the line according to a mod... so creeper threat, as it were.
 

biigoh

Well-Known Member
#62
When Hagrid goes to get Harry, he introduces him to a girl on a leash, whom Hagrid calls 'Ermione, and says is going to be Harry's guide and servant
'Servant' might or might not mean 'slave', it's up to the writer.
What is the problem you? Bondage/domination themes involving underage characters, no less - OBVIOUSLY creeper territory, NSFW and WAY PAST THE LINE.

That said, I am pleased that this was reported and that people spoke up against it. Thanks to all who help keep this website clean, friendly and funded by the advertisers who pay for the server.
Ban post by the mod
 

daniel_gudman

KING (In Land of Blind)
Staff member
#63
That "being a creeper" prohibition they've been going off about is annoying--it's so imprecise.

Bonus points: starting the post with a question and immediately guaranteeing that it cannot be answered.
 

SotF

Well-Known Member
#65
daniel_gudman said:
That "being a creeper" prohibition they've been going off about is annoying--it's so imprecise.

Bonus points: starting the post with a question and immediately guaranteeing that it cannot be answered.
Basically anything involving sex, especially with underage characters, is likely to get you a ban if it's noticed. With non-underage ones, you can still get some polite requests to stop before getting one though, that's part of why my first iteration of Mad World ended, mainly because I had two Mods ask nicely if I was sure that kind of thing was a good idea and getting somewhat uncomfortable with it myself
 
#66
My opinion is that it's not ban worthy. More than enough to get a stern warning though. Frankly I'm kinda embarrassed about how the mods seem to be on a Ban first ask questions never. Frankly speaking I;m sure people would have much less problems with it if the mods showed a bit more restraint, and simply gave an ultimatum of editing/deleting the creepy post or taking the temp. ban. Cause I'm sure most who make creepy posts either didn't have anything creepy in mind and it just came out wrong or simply misjudged what was allowed before the mods came a knocking.

I for one would have gladly edited my post if one had simply told me before banning me. Hell, I would have done so if one of the guys simply told me he was going to report it prior to actually doing so.

Just straight up banning doesn't fix the problem, it just eliminates the source. It's like killing the Kaiju, sure it gets rid of it but it doesn't do shit for the havoc already done. If they want it to remain PG than they need to at least allow the person who's made the offense to get rid of the post so it doesn't shut down a whole thread.
 

ragnarok1337

Well-Known Member
#67
The only reason you should be complaining is if the ban was unfair. Considering you all could have easily avoided your bans if you had bothered to actually take five minutes out of your life and read the rules this wouldn't be an issue at all. Ask yourself: if this were a public place where everyone could see and hear you, would you act the same?
 

daniel_gudman

KING (In Land of Blind)
Staff member
#68
ragnarok1337 said:
Ask yourself: if this were a public place where everyone could see and hear you, would you act the same?
Logical fallacy: false comparison.

It's because it's a semi-anonymous Internet forum that I feel the desire to indulge in "speaking about inappropriate things" with other interested parties. I watch my mouth in public and in front of my peers to avoid trouble, internet forums are where I go to escape that constraint.

Well, let me put it this way: my behavior reflects my preferences.

My post count on the moderated Space Battles forum?
31 (at time of writing)

My post count on the unmoderated TFF?
5011 (at time of writing)



I mean, okay, yeah, the SB community can choose to be PG-13, or SFW, or whatever, that's... I'd prefer if it was a moral free-for-all, but I'm not the King of Space, so my preferences aren't high-priority.

What bugs me is this sneering, condescending behavior towards "being a creeper", where people are castigated and shamed for offending the sensibilities of the mod team... but the mod team won't remove the blanket "don't be a creeper" exemption when everything it's purported to cover was already against the rules. So it's fixing what wasn't broken, by adding another, less distinct rule, that the mod team can use to hammer anyone who offends them.

If they want to prohibit certain speech because they want the board to be work-safe, that's fine, that's totally reasonable, I appreciate that. If they want to prohibit speech that deflects ad-dollars that support the server, that's annoying, but so is paying for a train ticket; I recognize the necessity and blame no-one, I appreciate it.

But I don't appreciate the mods using the rules to revel in feelings of moral superiority towards internet strangers. Even if he was in the wrong, I don't like seeing my friend get sneered at.
 
#69
ragnarok1337 said:
The only reason you should be complaining is if the ban was unfair. Considering you all could have easily avoided your bans if you had bothered to actually take five minutes out of your life and read the rules this wouldn't be an issue at all. Ask yourself: if this were a public place where everyone could see and hear you, would you act the same?
I did, it just that the rules are horrible vague and open to what the mod feels it encompasses. At the time I had no idea that what I wrote would be ban worthy, sure it was creepy and a bit horrible but I had not actually written anything explicit as it was merely a verbal threat that I had later written as being a complete bluff. In fact I have seen much worse on the forum that didn't get reported.

And yes, If i had written that story under my own name for public distribution than I still would have included such a threat. Because it's my fucking story and I felt that's what I felt should happen.
 

rdde

Well-Known Member
#70
Avider said:
Basically, SB is a PG-13 place?
It can't be PG-13 that they're using. The violence in SB is unrelenting, reprehensible and encouraged.
 

Avider

Well-Known Member
#71
Actual literature have much worse content. Actual award winning literature have much worse content.



Anyways that's just what SB doesn't want, which as a private forum (?) they're entirely entitled to. Only real problem I have with them is that they're douches about it.

It can't be PG-13 that they're using. The violence in SB is unrelenting, reprehensible and encouraged.
American (?) yo. Sex creeper, violence yay.
 
#72
Avider said:
Actual literature have much worse content. Actual award winning literature have much worse content.



Anyways that's just what SB doesn't want, which as a private forum (?) they're entirely entitled to. Only real problem I have with them is that they're douches about it.

It can't be PG-13 that they're using. The violence in SB is unrelenting, reprehensible and encouraged.
American (?) yo. Sex creeper, violence yay.
Yes they have a right to ban people who don't follow their rules. It's just that it's a dick move to not bother to properly explain said rules or give the target a chance to defend themselves.
 

rdde

Well-Known Member
#73
Avider said:
It can't be PG-13 that they're using. The violence in SB is unrelenting, reprehensible and encouraged.
American (?) yo. Sex creeper, violence yay.
Not necessarily American, but sadly true enough. You really don't have to look far to find inconsistencies in the world of adults and moral authorities.
 

goldenarms

Well-Known Member
#74
A Curious Stranger said:
daniel_gudman said:
Well it made a mod uncomfortable and that's all it takes at Space Battles, so there you go.
Well we might as well post Charon's full idea to be fair though.

A concept appeared in my head, and kept hopping around:

Firstly, for purposes of this idea, the reason magical training starts when it does (whether the canon age of eleven, or some later date, like thirteen or sixteen), is because that's when most wizards and witches can control their magic well enough to get consistent results from a wand. Late bloomers might be mistaken for squibs (if the parents or guardians don't go bug Dumbledore to check the Hogwarts Book), while early bloomers often experiment with wandless magic, as young Tom Riddle did (see Book 6). Hermione is probably an early bloomer, magically speaking, in the setting of this idea:

When Hagrid goes to get Harry, he introduces him to a girl on a leash, whom Hagrid calls 'Ermione, and says is going to be Harry's guide and servant due to having been raised in the muggle world, but also having lived a few years in the wizarding world. When Harry sees (or perhaps touches) the crest on her collar, he gets a feeling similar to the one he gets when he first holds his wand, and when he asks about the collar and leash, Hagrid explains that the leash is just to show who's responsible for her, while the collar keeps her under control, and connects her to her Master (Harry). Hagrid looks on her fondly, like one of his 'interesting creatures' (well, she's probably less dangerous than a dragon, at least), but reluctantly admits that she killed three people, even if it wasn't her fault.

Hermione shyly-but-unashamedly explains that she was running an experiment, and it went a little wrong. The idea ended at that point, but kept repeating with minor variations. Her parents might have been two of the three people who died. She may or may not be sociopathic or evil enough for keeping her collared to be the best thing for all concerned. It rather depends on whether or not you want to do a 'tear down the wizarding world' story from this.

Having Hogwarts start a few years later would give Harry time at Stonewall, away from Dudley, and would give Hermione more time to grow into the scary person in the idea.

'Servant' might or might not mean 'slave', it's up to the writer.
Seeing the idea in full (or mostly in full) makes me wonder why would the mods presumed to be about kinky sex bondage. Taken out of context, yeah, I can see it being some skeezy porn story that can get them in trouble, but in full, I'm more thinking Unleashed with Jet Lee than underage Gorean study.

Of course, to be fair, we are all kind of twisted little fucks to some degree, so our ideas of acceptable normalcy might be a bit skewed.
 

Prince Charon

Well-Known Member
#75
@daniel_gudman: Thank you for checking, anyway.

Yeah, that was the only thing I could think of that might have caused a ban (that I'd actually done, anyway), and it only occurred to me in hindsight, wondering why I got banned. The whole point of posting it to SB.com (and I think I might have said that, in a later post) was to get a non-sexual PoV on it!

On another note, aren't we supposed to get a warning for the first offense? I don't recall ever getting one for previous posts, though if it's been long enough, I could have forgotten it. Also, how does one go about appealing a ban, if the banning process prevents one from starting a conversation (when I went to SB.com, I saw that there was a message in my Inbox, but naturally couldn't get to it; might have been about the ban, but who knows)? Anyone want to risk asking about those points, or do you think questioning a mod like that will be a bannable offense?

Unrelated to the above, Mercsenary mentioned that XenForo thinks my last post was November 2012. Does it still think that, and if so, can someone please go look for a thread called Five Earths, All in a Row, in the main Space Battles forum? I posted that in mid-December 2012, so if it's still there, someone should let them know that XenForo is having weird problems that they may want to fix (yes, I'm still trying to help them; I'm annoyed at/disappointed in a mod, possibly more than one, not the whole community).

Off topic, but since I've mentioned it, the biggest reason I haven't posted Five Earths to this forum, is that I'm not sure where to put it, nor if there'd be much interest, here.
 
Top