Shiakou said:
Oh for the love of . . .
1. ...only Usagi can wipe out Chaos.
2. (climbing mount improbable)
3. can = should
1. Yes. I repeat: according to people who don't
believe otherwise. They don't
know.
I mean, the Ginzuisho is a concrete
thing. Just build another one, hell, build a better thing from the same principles. That'd be a better "gun."
What is Chaos made out of? Is it Baryonic? Okay, if it we can stream neutrons at it until if falls apart. I don't care if it's
called Chaos it still isn't coming back from being reduced to a highly unordered state and spread across the universe.
I mean, it's not like we've never seen a senshi be corrupted because there's no mechanism for voting them out of senshi-hood once they turn evil.
Oh yeah.
2. Your argument, broadly speaking, is irrelevant. Saying "something improbable could happen" doesn't mean it WILL happen. Conflating that with the anthropic principle doesn't add value.
3. Right, because the power to kill space-monsters is EXACTLY THE SAME as writing zoning laws. Splattering monsters is exactly the same as being on the board of directors trying to figure out how to best utilize urban space that is intermittently attacked by monsters.
I actually think there would be a tremendous backlash against the senshi after they "revealed" themselves.
"What do you mean ancient space queens tried to conquer the planet!? What do you mean, life-devouring yoma!? Why didn't you tell anyone
when it was happening!?"
Yeah Usagi can revive the dead and increase the human lifespan. She's also
keeping how its done a secret.
There are two points here.
1) Usagi should rule because she is a senshi, and the senshi are strong enough to protect us from Space Monsters.
In turn, I have two responses:
1.1) "With enough Gun." I
don't think Usagi's power is absolutely unique. I think whatever she can do can be done by
others. And I certainly know that I would want to be able to bring people back from the dead. Why is Usagi keeping how to do that secret from me? I don't want her to do it
for me, I want to do it
myself. What if she's too busy or something?
1.2) Okay, we'll reward and thank Usagi from protecting us from Space Monsters. That has nothing to do with ruling over us. Saving a child from falling off a bridge does not qualify you to write effective and reasonable safety guidelines for bridge construction.
2) Usagi should rule us because OMG she's the nicest, most compassionate person
ever.
Responses:
2.1) These are not necessarily good traits to have in a leader. I would prefer ethical courageousness and tremendous patience, and tact, myself.
2.2) Even if she
is qualified to rule humanity, I'm saying
term limits. I'm saying that no one person's competence matters, the fundamental ideal of a republican democracy is the government responds to the aggregate will of the people or they're
voted out of office. Imagine a scientist wants to study how Yoma siphon off life energy and replicate that in a lab. She forbids it because it's evil. Okay, except growing a vat of algae and drawing life force off them to run a generator sounds like an environmentally-friendly, sustainable way to generate electricity.
This is the point on the "boo-Usagi" side that I think isn't getting across clearly. Nobody is saying Usagi would
certainly be a bad ruler, although it's easy to think she would be if she was totally immune to and isolated from criticism.
No, the point is that a peaceful transition of power between political factions that don't agree with each other is the cornerstone of freedom. It is how liberty has come to exist. Whenever a coalition government falls apart and a new prime minister comes in and has to assemble a new government, whenever a US president is elected from a different political party than the last one, when this happens
without violence, that's freedom.
Besides...
Even the nicest and kindest of royalty can rule over oppressive countries. Like, say, in Thailand. Right now.