A thought that's been on my mind for awhile...
I'm aware that in regards to original characters that more chances than naught, they suck. Whether they're nothing but poorly made self-inserts of an egotistic author, or even poorly made paper cutout OMG Mary Sues for whatever reasons, we all have a general consensus that using OC's should be left to good writers only.
In regards to that, this raises my question - one that I've had ever since coming here and having been enlightened as to the true natures of OC's.
If good OC's should be left only to good authors, then what defines a good OC? Is there even such thing as one? In whatever amount of time we've spent reading and writing fanfiction, has any of us ever spotted a decently made original character?
Just curious.
I'm aware that in regards to original characters that more chances than naught, they suck. Whether they're nothing but poorly made self-inserts of an egotistic author, or even poorly made paper cutout OMG Mary Sues for whatever reasons, we all have a general consensus that using OC's should be left to good writers only.
In regards to that, this raises my question - one that I've had ever since coming here and having been enlightened as to the true natures of OC's.
If good OC's should be left only to good authors, then what defines a good OC? Is there even such thing as one? In whatever amount of time we've spent reading and writing fanfiction, has any of us ever spotted a decently made original character?
Just curious.