ecs05norway said:
Three star destroyers can reduce a planet to nothing but floating chunks of rubble?
Then why did the Empire need to build the Death Star? Kenobi says on-screen (which therefore overrides anything from 'tech manuals') that the ENTIRE IMPERIAL FLEET couldn't do that.
Sorry. You FAIL at life. And math. And everything else. Your sucktastic wankery has been refuted.
Three ISD's can carry out a 'Base Delta Zero' - render a planet uninhabitable via prolonged turbolaser bombardment of the surface. Prolonged as in several days.
A Vorlon Planet-Killer reduces the planet to rubble in one shot, same as the Death Star.
It's pretty funny that you're accusing someone of sucktastic wankery when it's really all you.
A Vorlon planet killer can reduce a planet to rubble in one shot, the same as the Death Star. Really?
Let's see, in
The Summoning Arkata 7 was taken out by the Vorlons.
The fleet that destroyed it was made up of thousands of ships, including several Planet Killers, not a lone PK. The planet was said to be destroyed, but it doesn't specify whether the planet was blown to pieces or just had its inhabitants killed. Furthermore, on several occasions planets have been referred to as destroyed by characters when it was just the inhabitants killed, not the planet blown to pieces.
In
Falling Toward Apotheosis Ventari is attacked and while the PK flies through asteroids they're obviously not the remains of the planet, seeing as dialogue makes it clear that there were people who escaped during the attack and a planet for those off-world to return to.
This episode also notes that the Vorlons jam communications while attacking, which usually lasts 10-12 hours.
Tizino Prime and Dura 7 are also hit, but there are survivors and a call for atmosphere capable ships and medical ships to help evacuate.
So, the Vorlon Planet Killer typically leaves the planet with some ability to support life and even survivors, possibly requiring several hours of bombardment, with the only planet that they might have actually blown to pieces being hit by a fleet of thousands and the destruction only being known because all communications from the planet having ceased, making it just as likely that it was just the inhabitants being killed.
Likewise you're also misrepresenting a Base Delta Zero as well. It doesn't take several days, it takes several hours, exactly how many is unknown, but definitely less than a day. Three Star Destroyers can carry one out while also preventing any escape, jamming all communications and completing the job before anyone arrives to see why communications have stopped. BDZ's are also mentioned as blasting off entire atmospheres, leaving surfaces as evenly cratered wastelands and causing so much damage that it's easier to terraform a completely new planet than try to restore the targeted one.
And you're saying that's the same as firepower as a Death Star, a ship capable of shooting through a high end planetary shield and turning a planet to debris in seconds? Which is also why the Death Star was needed, a fleet couldn't crack a shield and blow a planet to rubble before anyone noticed while a Death Star can, making it an effective terror weapon.
So yeah, the Vorlon Planet Killer's a joke compared to what you're claiming while a Star Destroyer outperforms it despite not even being a dedicated planet killer.