Harry Potter Shipping Shitstorm: JK Rowling Says Harry/Hermione Is How It Should Have Been

GaelicDragon

Well-Known Member
#51
seitora said:
The other thing about the purebloods is...besides the Weasleys, how many actually had more than two children? Heck, a lot of them seem to have only had one kid.
And we are using the generation that were born at the tail end of a civil war that was going badly. Unless compelled, most people are not going to want to have children in the middle of a conflict.

--

On the Pureblood issue, would it have made more sense to make it "cultural" as opposed to genealogy? Those steeped in wizarding culture dislike the new "immigrants" and those who toss out their ideals and customs for those of a group that they firmly believe is a threat.

Of course, making it genealogical probably a politically safer bet than a cultural difference.
 

NuitTombee

Immortal Capo
#52
Well, seems the full article has been shown now. http://www.mugglenet.com/jkrint-wonderland-020714.shtml

Jo Rowling wrote Harry Potter, the best-selling book series in history, yet she still manages to be funny, kind, warm and real. She spends masses of her time supporting charities such as Comic Relief, Multiple Sclerosis Research through the Anne Rowling Regenerative Neurology Clinic and her own children's charity Lumos... More recently she wrote novels The Casual Vacancy and The Cuckoo's Calling (a crime novel under the pseudonym Robert Galbraith).

I wanted to ask you about the script that you are writing for Warner Bros. for Fantastic Beasts...

Warner Bros. came to me ages ago and said they wanted to do something with Fantastic Beasts. I could see the potential in it. I knew something about Newt [Scamander, the fictional author of Fantastic Beasts] having written a little something for Comic Relief. I had imagined a little bit of back story for him...

So when Warner Bros. came to me and said they wanted to make a film out of the book I had this simultaneous feeling of "it has a lot of potential," and another feeling of slight panic that "I know some things about Newt and I don't want you to ruin that for me!" because I knew who he was. So then I went away and sort of dwelt on what I knew about Newt, not intending to write a script but just trying to collect my thoughts so that I could at least give them the backstory I'd imagined, so that their vision was true to what I knew.

Then I really did have one of those moments that always make you phenomenally excited as a writer; but also that you know is going to end up being a ton of work. I thought, "Oh my God, a whole plot's just descended on me!" But I wanted to do it as I was really excited about it. I wasn't really thinking about writing the script myself, I thought, you know, I'll give them this plot and then – fatally – I sat down and thought "I just wonder what it would look like..." and wrote a rough draft in twelve days!

Ahhhhh!

It wasn't a great draft but it did show the shape of how it might look. So that is how it all started.

Wow, Warner Bros. must have been so excited.

I think they were kind of stunned. I didn't tell them I had written it in twelve days. I've never written a script. It truly wasn't that I thought I'd be good at it, I just wanted to get the outline of the story down, and that's obviously given me a lot to work with going forward.

Do you ever worry when you have a great idea, when a piece of inspiration strikes you, that you won't ever get it down quickly enough?

Yes definitely, although I do work on the convenient premise that if it is worth keeping you will remember it. I don't think I have ever lost or forgotten anything that was really worth remembering!

Does inspiration ever strike you at really inconvenient moments? Like when you are driving the car or you are taking the children to school and you just think, "not now"?!

That is why I don't drive, I swear to God. I cannot drive. People look at me and think, 'how can you be a woman of forty-eight and not drive a car?' But I know myself and I know how detached I am from my physical surroundings.

My husband has taken to warning me from three rooms away that he is getting closer so that I don't scream. It's ridiculous because obviously I do know that I live with my husband, but that's how jumpy I am. He's gotten used to the fact that I'm a long way away in my head and that I get disconcerted when someone sneaks up on me.

But that tendency does have its advantages because I'm able to concentrate to a degree where I can totally shut everyone out, write it down or really commit it to memory, and then, you know, I've got it in the bank. I do think my apprenticeship writing the first three Harry Potters when I was a single mother and didn't have a lot of support meant that I learned to be very efficient at using the time that I have.

You also announced that you're going to collaborate on a theatre production.

Yes that was a really interesting idea that Sonia Friedman came up with. I've been so resistant for a long time about theatre productions. Quite a few people wanted to do a Harry Potter musical. I didn't really see Harry as a musical so we said no to all of that, but Sonia came along with a very thoughtful, very interesting idea. I'm quite excited about that.

Will Hermione be in it?!

Well Emma if you are offering to play Hermione... [both laugh] I tell you what I really want. I want you and Dan and Rupert in really heavy make-up in the background of a scene in Fantastic Beasts, and I'll join you and we'll sit in a bar room having a laugh for an afternoon. Do you not think that would be fantastic?

That sounds like the most fun I can imagine having!

And we can mess around as extras in the background.

And then we can see if anyone can spot us. I personally would like to be in drag, just to make sure no one can spot me at all.

GENIUS!

There are so many things that you could say you have achieved, what is the most meaningful to you? What is your greatest triumph?

Of what I've written, Deathly Hallows was a phenomenally emotional experience and my favourite of the Potter series by a mile. It wasn't just about the writing, it was wrapping up a story that had taken me through seventeen years of my life and had meant as much as any literary creation can mean to any writer. I mean, not just because it transformed my life materially, which of course it did, but that comes a poor fourth or fifth compared to the other things that Harry Potter did for me.

But, I hope that the best is still to come. Nothing will ever top Potter in terms of popularity, I've accepted that, but on my death bed I may look back on one of my least popular books and it may well turn out to be the one I was proudest of, because different things matter to the writer.

I thought we should discuss Hermione... I'm sure you've heard this a million times but now that you have written the books, do you have a new perspective on how you relate to Hermione and the relationship you have with her or had with her?

I know that Hermione is incredibly recognisable to a lot of readers and yet you don't see a lot of Hermiones in film or on TV except to be laughed at. I mean that the intense, clever, in some ways not terribly self-aware, girl is rarely the heroine and I really wanted her to be the heroine. She is part of me, although she is not wholly me. I think that is how I might have appeared to people when I was younger, but that is not really how I was inside.

What I will say is that I wrote the Hermione/Ron relationship as a form of wish fulfillment. That's how it was conceived, really. For reasons that have very little to do with literature and far more to do with me clinging to the plot as I first imagined it, Hermione with Ron.

Ah.

I know, I'm sorry, I can hear the rage and fury it might cause some fans, but if I'm absolutely honest, distance has given me perspective on that. It was a choice I made for very personal reasons, not for reasons of credibility. Am I breaking people's hearts by saying this? I hope not.

I don't know. I think there are fans out there who know that too and who wonder whether Ron would have really been able to make her happy.

Yes exactly.

And vice versa.

It was a young relationship. I think the attraction itself is plausible but the combative side of it... I'm not sure you could have got over that in an adult relationship, there was too much fundamental incompatibility. I can't believe we are saying all of this – this is Potter heresy!

I know, it is heresy.

In some ways Hermione and Harry are a better fit and I'll tell you something very strange. When I wrote Hallows, I felt this quite strongly when I had Hermione and Harry together in the tent! I hadn't told [Steve] Kloves that and when he wrote the script he felt exactly the same thing at exactly the same point.

That is just so interesting because when I was doing the scene I said to David [Heyman]: "This isn't in the book, she didn't write this". I'm not sure I am comfortable insinuating something however subtle it is!

Yes, but David and Steve – they felt what I felt when writing it.

That is so strange.

And actually I liked that scene in the film, because it was articulating something I hadn't said but I had felt. I really liked it and I thought that it was right. I think you do feel the ghost of what could have been in that scene.

It's a really haunting scene. It's funny because it really divided people. Some people loved that scene and some people really didn't.

Yes, some people utterly hated it. But that is true of so many really good scenes in books and films; they evoke that strong positive/negative feeling. I was fine with it, I liked it.

I remember really loving shooting those scenes that don't have any dialogue, where you are just kind of trying to express a moment in time and a feeling without saying anything. It was just Dan and I spontaneously sort of trying to convey an idea and it was really fun.

And you got it perfectly, you got perfectly the sort of mixture of awkwardness and genuine emotion, because it teeters on the edge of "what are we doing? Oh come on let's do it anyway", which I thought was just right for that time.

I think it was just the sense that in the moment they needed to be together and be kids and raise each other's morale.

That is just it, you are so right. All this says something very powerful about the character of Hermione as well. Hermione was the one that stuck with Harry all the way through that last installment, that very last part of the adventure. It wasn't Ron, which also says something very powerful about Ron. He was injured in a way, in his self-esteem, from the start of the series. He always knew he came second to fourth best, and then had to make friends with the hero of it all and that's a hell of a position to be in, eternally overshadowed. So Ron had to act out in that way at some point.

But Hermione's always there for Harry. I remember you sent me a note after you read Hallows and before you started shooting, and said something about that, because it was Hermione's journey as much as Harry's at the end.

I completely agree and the fact that they were true equals and the fact that she really said goodbye to her family makes it her sacrifice too.

Yes, her sacrifice was massive, completely. A very calculated act of bravery. That is not an 'in the moment' act of bravery where emotion carries you through, that is a deliberate choice.

Exactly.

I love Hermione.

I love her too.

Oh, maybe she and Ron will be alright with a bit of counseling, you know. I wonder what happens at wizard marriage counseling? They'll probably be fine. He needs to work on his self-esteem issues and she needs to work on being a little less critical.

I think it makes sense to me that Ron would make friends with the most famous wizard in the school because I think life presents to you over and over again your biggest and most painful fear – until you conquer it. It just keeps coming up.

That is so true, it has happened in my own life. The issue keeps coming up because you are drawn to it and you are putting yourself in front of it all the time. At a certain point you have to choose what to do about it and sometimes conquering it is choosing to say: I don't want that anymore, I'm going to stop walking up to you because there is nothing there for me. But yes, you're so right, that's very insightful! Ron's used to playing second fiddle. I think that's a comfortable role for him, but at a certain point he has to be his own man, doesn't he?

Yes and until he does it is unresolved. It is unfinished business. So maybe life presented this to him enough times until he had to make a choice and become the man that Hermione needs.

Just like her creator, she has a real weakness for a funny man. These uptight girls, they do like them funny.

They do like them funny, they need them funny.

It's such a relief from being so intense yourself – you need someone who takes life, or appears to take life, a little more light heartedly.

Definitely so important.

Thank you so much for doing this.
 

Shirotsume

Not The Goddamn @dmin
#53
Meh. My two cents here that nobody probably cares about- Harry/Hermione always made the most sense to me. Like a lot of things, Ron/Hermione always felt a bit like an asspull.

I feel like Harry/Ginny COULD work, maybe even EVENTUALLY work given canon... if they worked hard at it.

In other words,

Harry/Hermione works, to me, because Hermione is bossy enough to never let Harry just fuck off and ignore her- which is something he has a nasty habit of doing to people close to him, yet Harry is strong enough of character to never let her control him. More to the point, she's one of the few people that actually understands him, because she has always been there, save the firebolt incident and the months before the troll incident.

Ron/Hermione doesn't work unless the angry/makeup sex is glorious and they end up having fifty billion children. Otherwise, it's a domestic abuse case waiting to happen, because Ron isn't going to deal well with having a more successful wife than him due to his jealousy, and we all know Hermione would have precisely none of his shit.

Harry/Ginny could work, if they manage to get over Ginny having a hero crush and actually ends up standing next to him as a PARTNER, and Harry actually opens up to her- which he's never, ever done. Hermione has the advantage of being there, he doesn't need to open up to her, but to Ginny he would have to.

tl;dr: RHr is fucking stupid, HHr makes sense, HG would take work.

Honestly, as a matter of personal opinion, while HG could work, canon's HG freaks me the fuck out because there's way too many (possibly unintentional) hints she's mindraping him with love potions, and that shit creeps me out on a very base level.
 

seitora

Well-Known Member
#54
GaelicDragon said:
seitora said:
The other thing about the purebloods is...besides the Weasleys, how many actually had more than two children? Heck, a lot of them seem to have only had one kid.
And we are using the generation that were born at the tail end of a civil war that was going badly. Unless compelled, most people are not going to want to have children in the middle of a conflict.
That is true, I suppose. The two main Black branches had three sisters and two brothers, while Molly had two (twin) brothers as well. James was an only child, though, and I think that whole 'old parents, difficult pregnancy' thing about his mother was just fanon?
 

shiki

Well-Known Member
#55
Just read the interview. HA! I knew it. My wild guess was spot on. Even the movies influencing her.
shiki said:
LOL wut? So it turns out that all the people that argued that Ron was a sub-optimal choice and the BIG WEASLEY FAMILY were right all along.

By the way, it seems legit. AFP was reporting it and I saw it linked via yahoo news.

Edit: While I think that H/Hr would have been a better couple than R/Hr (it was a belief that I have held since 2002 but I was never a heavy ship guy), I wouldn't say that Harry wit Hermione would have been a good idea in the books in the end. Their personalities work great as the best friends and partners that they were but... not so much as lovers without a lot of work (less than what it would to have a realistic R/Hr relationship but more than it would to have a stable H/G one). Hermione, while a loyal and good person, is a bit controlling and highly stubbornly opinionated in her views. Those traits wouldn't mesh well romantically with Harry and his dislike of being controlled; you know that he has major issues despite canonically forgiving his puppet masters. Real relationships take work. So, they would be a good couple but it would be a realistic one with compromise and sacrifice.

Ginny, regardless of how abrupt or shallow their romance was, really was the easy and logical choice for Harry after the war. She would provide him with an instant family and she wouldn't push him like Hermione would. It would also be much less work to maintain a content relationship on his end. She literally would be the fantasy end with a happily ever after without all the hard work.

I just looked at it as a final "eff you" to Dumbledore. He deserved to be able to choose the easy option after being covertly directed and forced to chose the harder "right" option his entire life.
shiki said:
Nah, this doesn't weaken anything at all. What she wrote still stands, it isn't like she decided to reprint a revised version or anything. She did have it all figured out, that was what she regrets. She said that she forced the ships and that she regrets that. Additionally, the romance was in no way a vital major part of the books at all. You could remove it from the books and nothing would be lost at all.

Anyways, like I said before, Canon is still Canon.

All this does is spur the fandom to discussion. I wouldn't be surprised if this all started because how the movies were handled the ships. For those that don't know, the director for the last three films was an obvious H/Hr fan worked this ship in subtly while indelicately dealt with the canon ships by tossing it out there with heavy handed scenes. It wasn't happenstance that there were so many intimate Harry/Hermione scenes in the movies. I bet those movies had a lot to do with the change of heart, I mean, just watch HBF to DH2 and take notes of the intimate scenes between the trio and compare them. One pair has chemistry and actually has conversations full of feeling and intimacy and the other pair is explosive and seems to happen in the heat of the moment. Not saying that one is better or not but there was a clear difference in the movies.

Now the books... all the romances were horrible except for Neville/Heroism. He was the true hero in Hogwarts that year in the absence of the Trio and he stepped up beautifully.
All those people that called me crazy and over analyzing thing when the movies came out can suck it. The author and script writer and the actors all admit that it was on purpose. Knew I wasn't seeing things that weren't there.

Edit: Btw, you guys should check DLP. Funny shit going on about this and Raine even popped up to express his hatred of Hermione because he is all butthurt about the attention this is getting.
 

Jeopardizer

Well-Known Member
#56
Shirotsume said:
Harry/Hermione works, to me, because Hermione is bossy enough to never let Harry just fuck off and ignore her- which is something he has a nasty habit of doing to people close to him, yet Harry is strong enough of character to never let her control him. More to the point, she's one of the few people that actually understands him, because she has always been there, save the firebolt incident and the months before the troll incident.

Ron/Hermione doesn't work unless the angry/makeup sex is glorious and they end up having fifty billion children. Otherwise, it's a domestic abuse case waiting to happen, because Ron isn't going to deal well with having a more successful wife than him due to his jealousy, and we all know Hermione would have precisely none of his shit.

Harry/Ginny could work, if they manage to get over Ginny having a hero crush and actually ends up standing next to him as a PARTNER, and Harry actually opens up to her- which he's never, ever done. Hermione has the advantage of being there, he doesn't need to open up to her, but to Ginny he would have to.
Yeah I totally see Ron being abusive to Hermione because she is more successful than him, I mean it's not like she constantly outshined him at hogwarts every step of the way, right?

Also Harry not opening up to Ginny? Go read again and you will see it happens, they bond over being some of the most personnaly affected by Riddle and shit. Also Ginny happens to like Quidditch (like Harry so they have de facto more hobbies in common than H and Hr) and is apparently hot, and playing quidditch and being hot is what get Harry's gear going (what with Cho and all.)

Also your argument for H/Hr about her not letting him go and him not letting her control him... Well it's not enough. Relationships are a two way street and if one is bearing all the weight then there is nothing stopping her from throwing the burden away.

Now I'm not especially a fan of R/Hr, but there is really no need to go making Ron worse than he is or drooling about H/Hr-OTP-every-step-of-the-way.
 

nixofcyzerra

Well-Known Member
#57
shiki, can I get a link? I hate navigating DLP.
 

Shirotsume

Not The Goddamn @dmin
#58
Jeopardizer said:
Shirotsume said:
Harry/Hermione works, to me, because Hermione is bossy enough to never let Harry just fuck off and ignore her- which is something he has a nasty habit of doing to people close to him, yet Harry is strong enough of character to never let her control him. More to the point, she's one of the few people that actually understands him, because she has always been there, save the firebolt incident and the months before the troll incident.

Ron/Hermione doesn't work unless the angry/makeup sex is glorious and they end up having fifty billion children. Otherwise, it's a domestic abuse case waiting to happen, because Ron isn't going to deal well with having a more successful wife than him due to his jealousy, and we all know Hermione would have precisely none of his shit.

Harry/Ginny could work, if they manage to get over Ginny having a hero crush and actually ends up standing next to him as a PARTNER, and Harry actually opens up to her- which he's never, ever done. Hermione has the advantage of being there, he doesn't need to open up to her, but to Ginny he would have to.
Yeah I totally see Ron being abusive to Hermione because she is more successful than him, I mean it's not like she constantly outshined him at hogwarts every step of the way, right?

Also Harry not opening up to Ginny? Go read again and you will see it happens, they bond over being some of the most personnaly affected by Riddle and shit. Also Ginny happens to like Quidditch (like Harry so they have de facto more hobbies in common than H and Hr) and is apparently hot, and playing quidditch and being hot is what get Harry's gear going (what with Cho and all.)

Also your argument for H/Hr about her not letting him go and him not letting her control him... Well it's not enough. Relationships are a two way street and if one is bearing all the weight then there is nothing stopping her from throwing the burden away.

Now I'm not especially a fan of R/Hr, but there is really no need to go making Ron worse than he is or drooling about H/Hr-OTP-every-step-of-the-way.
I don't mean physically abusive, emotionally. It's not like Ron hasn't made Hermione cry basically every single time something happens, ever. Oh wait.

As for Ginny, one shared hobby and being 'hot' does not make a relationship. It makes for a one night stand.

As for your comment about H/Hr being onesided... where the fuck did you pull that out of your ass? That's not even remotely close to what I was talking about.
 

goldenarms

Well-Known Member
#61
DhampyrX2 said:
Honestly, I put this little tidbit right up there with Rowling "revealing" the "fact" that Dumbledore was gay. Mostly in the "who cares?" column. Canon was still canon regardless of this little drama bomb.
Well, the difference between Dumbledore's sexuality and regretting a certain shipping is that the former actually has an impact on the story in regards as to how it influences his character and how readers perceive and interpret the man.

Also, as I said once before, reading HBP and DH, I couldn't help but feel the vibe on Dumbledore, the way he cared for Harry, and the way Rowling described his relationship with Grindelwald. I was like, "Okay, this is getting into some uncomfortable territory..." and jut plowed on ahead. With Rowling publicly outing him, it all made sense why I was thinking this guy seems to be a little more than just "caring" about these dudes.

...And I think I just reopened the path to more horrific Dum/H slash fics... forgive me...
 

pidl

Well-Known Member
#62
goldenarms said:
DhampyrX2 said:
Honestly, I put this little tidbit right up there with Rowling "revealing" the "fact" that Dumbledore was gay. Mostly in the "who cares?" column. Canon was still canon regardless of this little drama bomb.
Well, the difference between Dumbledore's sexuality and regretting a certain shipping is that the former actually has an impact on the story in regards as to how it influences his character and how readers perceive and interpret the man.

Also, as I said once before, reading HBP and DH, I couldn't help but feel the vibe on Dumbledore, the way he cared for Harry, and the way Rowling described his relationship with Grindelwald. I was like, "Okay, this is getting into some uncomfortable territory..." and jut plowed on ahead. With Rowling publicly outing him, it all made sense why I was thinking this guy seems to be a little more than just "caring" about these dudes.

...And I think I just reopened the path to more horrific Dum/H slash fics... forgive me...
You have some rather disturbing ideas about gay people if you saw hints of DD/H...
 

Fellgrave

Well-Known Member
#63
And yet, some people write those stories anyway.
 

seitora

Well-Known Member
#64
Really, this whole interview isn't going to change the stories being written anyways. It's just adding fuel to the massive wars that must be taking place on other forums (but out of sight, out of mind).
 

Shirotsume

Not The Goddamn @dmin
#65
seitora said:
Really, this whole interview isn't going to change the stories being written anyways. It's just adding fuel to the massive wars that must be taking place on other forums (but out of sight, out of mind).
Which is what makes it glorious.

I hope Rowling goes full troll mode eventually.
 

seitora

Well-Known Member
#66
If she comes out tomorrow and says "But you know, looking back on it, Harry and Luna should really have ended up together", I will...send her fan mail thanking her. Both because I appreciate that pairing and for trollololing even more.
 

tigros40208

Well-Known Member
#67
Shirotsume said:
seitora said:
Really, this whole interview isn't going to change the stories being written anyways. It's just adding fuel to the massive wars that must be taking place on other forums (but out of sight, out of mind).
Which is what makes it glorious.

I hope Rowling goes full troll mode eventually.
Reminds me of my AP English class in High School. We were discussing some book and what the author really meant from 200 years from the grave. I got annoyed that so much BS was getting spouted that I talked about how I was going to write a bestseller. And then years down the line come up with some off the wall parody of what it meant so everyone would be wrong.
 

seitora

Well-Known Member
#68
If I ever wrote a bestseller and movie studios were latching on to me for film rights, then the next book I wrote would describe everybody, and I mean everybody as super-ugly. Then I'd demand whoever adapted a film for that book that there couldn't be anybody looking super good.

(Amazingly enough, they actually stuck to Peter Pettigrew looking ugly. Everyone else, not so much)
 

e39042

Well-Known Member
#69
seitora said:
If I ever wrote a bestseller and movie studios were latching on to me for film rights, then the next book I wrote would describe everybody, and I mean everybody as super-ugly. Then I'd demand whoever adapted a film for that book that there couldn't be anybody looking super good.

(Amazingly enough, they actually stuck to Peter Pettigrew looking ugly. Everyone else, not so much)
The Harry Potter films weren't exactly filled with gorgeous people. You can make an argument that Emma Watson is too pretty to be Hermione, but Rupert is pretty average looking and Daniel Radcliffe, whilst nothing like how I picture Harry in my head, isn't any better looking than you'd expect Harry to be given his genetics. Maybe a bit too healthy but under feeding a child actor for a role would be a bit sociopathic.

I'd like to know who you think is too good looking aside from Hermione to be honest.
 

shiki

Well-Known Member
#70
Snape needed to be way uglier. Neville needed to be way uglier.
 

da_fox2279

California Crackpot
#71
e39042 said:
seitora said:
If I ever wrote a bestseller and movie studios were latching on to me for film rights, then the next book I wrote would describe everybody, and I mean everybody as super-ugly. Then I'd demand whoever adapted a film for that book that there couldn't be anybody looking super good.

(Amazingly enough, they actually stuck to Peter Pettigrew looking ugly. Everyone else, not so much)
The Harry Potter films weren't exactly filled with gorgeous people. You can make an argument that Emma Watson is too pretty to be Hermione, but Rupert is pretty average looking and Daniel Radcliffe, whilst nothing like how I picture Harry in my head, isn't any better looking than you'd expect Harry to be given his genetics. Maybe a bit too healthy but under feeding a child actor for a role would be a bit sociopathic.

I'd like to know who you think is too good looking aside from Hermione to be honest.
SNAPE. Alan Rickman is just too pretty for the role. And I don't know, Neville was ... not exactly good-looking, but not really that ugly during the first few films. Once he lost the baby fat, I think he was alright.
 

pidl

Well-Known Member
#72
da_fox2279 said:
e39042 said:
seitora said:
If I ever wrote a bestseller and movie studios were latching on to me for film rights, then the next book I wrote would describe everybody, and I mean everybody as super-ugly. Then I'd demand whoever adapted a film for that book that there couldn't be anybody looking super good.

(Amazingly enough, they actually stuck to Peter Pettigrew looking ugly. Everyone else, not so much)
The Harry Potter films weren't exactly filled with gorgeous people. You can make an argument that Emma Watson is too pretty to be Hermione, but Rupert is pretty average looking and Daniel Radcliffe, whilst nothing like how I picture Harry in my head, isn't any better looking than you'd expect Harry to be given his genetics. Maybe a bit too healthy but under feeding a child actor for a role would be a bit sociopathic.

I'd like to know who you think is too good looking aside from Hermione to be honest.
SNAPE. Alan Rickman is just too pretty for the role. And I don't know, Neville was ... not exactly good-looking, but not really that ugly during the first few films. Once he lost the baby fat, I think he was alright.
I don't remember Neville being described as ugly in the books...
 

Cynical Kyle

Well-Known Member
#73
pidl said:
da_fox2279 said:
e39042 said:
seitora said:
If I ever wrote a bestseller and movie studios were latching on to me for film rights, then the next book I wrote would describe everybody, and I mean everybody as super-ugly. Then I'd demand whoever adapted a film for that book that there couldn't be anybody looking super good.

(Amazingly enough, they actually stuck to Peter Pettigrew looking ugly. Everyone else, not so much)
The Harry Potter films weren't exactly filled with gorgeous people. You can make an argument that Emma Watson is too pretty to be Hermione, but Rupert is pretty average looking and Daniel Radcliffe, whilst nothing like how I picture Harry in my head, isn't any better looking than you'd expect Harry to be given his genetics. Maybe a bit too healthy but under feeding a child actor for a role would be a bit sociopathic.

I'd like to know who you think is too good looking aside from Hermione to be honest.
SNAPE. Alan Rickman is just too pretty for the role. And I don't know, Neville was ... not exactly good-looking, but not really that ugly during the first few films. Once he lost the baby fat, I think he was alright.
I don't remember Neville being described as ugly in the books...
If you don't consider fat to be ugly, then you're right.
 

pidl

Well-Known Member
#74
Cynical Kyle said:
pidl said:
da_fox2279 said:
e39042 said:
seitora said:
If I ever wrote a bestseller and movie studios were latching on to me for film rights, then the next book I wrote would describe everybody, and I mean everybody as super-ugly. Then I'd demand whoever adapted a film for that book that there couldn't be anybody looking super good.

(Amazingly enough, they actually stuck to Peter Pettigrew looking ugly. Everyone else, not so much)
The Harry Potter films weren't exactly filled with gorgeous people. You can make an argument that Emma Watson is too pretty to be Hermione, but Rupert is pretty average looking and Daniel Radcliffe, whilst nothing like how I picture Harry in my head, isn't any better looking than you'd expect Harry to be given his genetics. Maybe a bit too healthy but under feeding a child actor for a role would be a bit sociopathic.

I'd like to know who you think is too good looking aside from Hermione to be honest.
SNAPE. Alan Rickman is just too pretty for the role. And I don't know, Neville was ... not exactly good-looking, but not really that ugly during the first few films. Once he lost the baby fat, I think he was alright.
I don't remember Neville being described as ugly in the books...
If you don't consider fat to be ugly, then you're right.
Except he's described as round-faced, not fat. At the most he's short and plump, and that's said in an interview.
 
Top