Shirotsume said:
Archfiend said:
Uhh, no. I had a problem with it as well. I guess I just forgot to mention it.
As for having a poll and not an entire setup like we had for rules: In rules, you needed to choose between three-four options for several different catagories. You can't do that with a poll.
With the moderation, the fact is, you're choosing one person FOR moderation. If you're trying to vote against someone, you're doing it wrong an need a boot in the head.
At the end of the day, even if we judge each person individually, we still need to to compare them AGAINST each other to find who the mod ends up.
His suggestion was to implement a variation of an "Immediate Runoff Election", which is a concept in politics.
In a runoff election, you don't vote for one person, instead you rank the candidates based on who you prefer.
Then when the ballots are counted, the candidates are weighed accordingly.
A good way to demonstrate this is through example, say there are three candidates and three voters.
Code:
Voter X:
Adam
Ben
Carl
Voter Y:
Carl
Ben
Adam
Voter Z:
Ben
Carl
Adam
So the results are:
Ben with 4 votes.
Carl with 3 votes.
Adam with 2 votes.
Each candidate was the top candidate for one of the three voters, but those who voted for Adam preferred Ben over Carl, and those who voted for Carl preferred Ben over Adam. Thus making Ben the least disagreeable option overall.
ArchfiendRai's idea works on the same theory, except each voter can submit either 1 or 0 vote to each candidate. With 1 vote for those he agrees with, and 0 for those he disagrees with, and the most agreeable candidates winning the election.