Kibbles said:
SmileOfTheKill said:
Archer is cooler since wanting to be selfless and hopeful is lame.
Archer is worse because he's a coward, unwilling to live with his choices and looking for a way out. It's pathetic.
...You do remember that his whole entire arc was, "When I died, it was with a contented smile because I spent my whole life doing what I wanted to do. There really wasn't anything I regretted. But then AFTER I died it turned out the supernatural force I made a deal with so I could save people wasn't a big wad of hope like I thought it was, it was actually Demons."
Archer fully accepted his choices and died without regrets. He just thought that contracting with the "Will of Humanity" would
not entail an afterlife that was 100% indescriminately slaughtering humans.
EMIYA did not become Archer when he died, he became that way after subjective centuries of being, functionally, a nuclear bomb.
If being a Counter Guardian meant punching out Primate Murder every time it tried to kill people or shooting swords at Roa every time he tried to devour a village, then EMIYA would have loved the shit out of being a Counter Guardian for Alaya. But instead Nasu had the "Will of Humanity" use him to just kill everyone inside the radius of Events, so he did't just fight Roa, he also slaughtered the whole village just to be safe or something.
So he decided to break the contract by contradicting himself out of existence, which might count as suicide... except he was already dead. Because he was sick of just being a murder engine.
Well, unless he gets distracted by saving someone like Rin or Saber (Fate), or getting in Medea or Gil's way (UBW), or running interference on Dark Sakura (HF).
So basically he's trying to get out of a contract that was much different then he thought it was... unless his ideal of saving people becomes relevant, in which case he immediately prioritizes that.
EMIYA is so goal-oriented it's nuts.