Comic News

zeebee1

Well-Known Member
I think he's talking about Doc, or maybe he was called Professor. Either way, he was just a random personality that even Samson thought was the real thing.

Also, I remember how Banner once used meditation and could throw buildings around.
 

Ghostface

Lazy Bastard...
<a href='http://www.bleedingcool.com/2011/12/10/fanboy-rampage-jms-vs-steve-wacker/' target='_blank' rel='nofollow'>How the fuck did I miss this?</a> God, I love Mark Waid.
 

Prince Charon

Well-Known Member
Ghostface said:
<a href='http://www.bleedingcool.com/2011/12/10/fanboy-rampage-jms-vs-steve-wacker/' target='_blank' rel='nofollow'>How the fuck did I miss this?</a> God, I love Mark Waid.
To be fair, if the numbers are accurate, then the current creative team is very likely doing something wrong, and isn't fixing it.
 

atlas_hugged

Well-Known Member
Correlation does not imply causation. I'd like to see numbers controlled for how the comic book industry as a whole is doing to start off with.
 

Ordo

Well-Known Member
ucal said:
Correlation does not imply causation. I'd like to see numbers controlled for how the comic book industry as a whole is doing to start off with.
<a href='http://www.comichron.com/yearlycomicssales.html' target='_blank' rel='nofollow'>Yearly Comic Sales</a>

<a href='http://www.icv2.com/articles/news/1850.html' target='_blank' rel='nofollow'>More data</a>

Personally I think they handled this completely wrong, getting angry at JMS was the wrong move, or at least posting in anger was the wrong move. It would've been better to post raw data that countered his post and left it at that.
 

ttestagr

Well-Known Member
Especially since JMS is right. The editorial mandate that pretty much assured his leaving, which Marvel has allowed to continue, is a state of affairs that no one likes. I'm pretty sure that Spidey will not sell close to what he should until the idiocy about his marriage is retconned away.

All in all, the Marvel editorial team is complete shit. Hell, they've even been driving the X titles down. Something most considered nearly impossible, especially with another big civil rights movement in the works as a real life backdrop.
 

Ordo

Well-Known Member
Marvel Editor: *sipping a glass of chianti* "I hate comics and everything to do with them..."

Likely untrue but sometimes you have to wonder.
 
ttestagr said:
Especially since JMS is right. The editorial mandate that pretty much assured his leaving, which Marvel has allowed to continue, is a state of affairs that no one likes. I'm pretty sure that Spidey will not sell close to what he should until the idiocy about his marriage is retconned away.

All in all, the Marvel editorial team is complete shit. Hell, they've even been driving the X titles down. Something most considered nearly impossible, especially with another big civil rights movement in the works as a real life backdrop.
That said they had a point. It was incredibly petty of JMS. The new author is trying his hardest with fenuinely fun and entertaining stories. Spider Island was Marvel's big event for me. Beating out Fear Itself. peter's gotten out of that relationship with the blond, and on the verge of getting back together with MJ. His secret identity can now be deducted. Strange's spell to ptotect him is over.

Sorry if my spelling is not up to par. Phone is really hard to type on.
 

TC_Hazard

Well-Known Member
Prince Charon said:
Ghostface said:
<a href='http://www.bleedingcool.com/2011/12/10/fanboy-rampage-jms-vs-steve-wacker/' target='_blank' rel='nofollow'>How the fuck did I miss this?</a>á God, I love Mark Waid.
To be fair, if the numbers are accurate, then the current creative team is very likely doing something wrong, and isn't fixing it.
The chart by its own admission uses the lowest selling issue per month. Plus, economical stuff.

Truth is even after OMD, Spider-Man has been one of Marvel's top selling books.

Sidenote: Mark Waid is awesome.
 

Ordo

Well-Known Member
TC_Hazard said:
Prince Charon said:
Ghostface said:
<a href='http://www.bleedingcool.com/2011/12/10/fanboy-rampage-jms-vs-steve-wacker/' target='_blank' rel='nofollow'>How the fuck did I miss this?</a>á God, I love Mark Waid.
To be fair, if the numbers are accurate, then the current creative team is very likely doing something wrong, and isn't fixing it.
The chart by its own admission uses the lowest selling issue per month. Plus, economical stuff.

Truth is even after OMD, Spider-Man has been one of Marvel's top selling books.

Sidenote: Mark Waid is awesome.
Then by all means give a rebuttal using the highest, I'd be curious about the numbers, rather than descending into a flame war.
 

TC_Hazard

Well-Known Member
Ordo said:
TC_Hazard said:
Prince Charon said:
Ghostface said:
<a href='http://www.bleedingcool.com/2011/12/10/fanboy-rampage-jms-vs-steve-wacker/' target='_blank' rel='nofollow'>How the fuck did I miss this?</a>á God, I love Mark Waid.
To be fair, if the numbers are accurate, then the current creative team is very likely doing something wrong, and isn't fixing it.
The chart by its own admission uses the lowest selling issue per month. Plus, economical stuff.

Truth is even after OMD, Spider-Man has been one of Marvel's top selling books.

Sidenote: Mark Waid is awesome.
Then by all means give a rebuttal using the highest, I'd be curious about the numbers, rather than descending into a flame war.
As I don't work in Marvel, I don't know the numbers. The best I could do would be looking up Diamond estimates, which would be investing far more effort in this than it deserves.

Does it really matter though? Even in one of the links you have given, one can see there are three Spider-Man books in the top 25 books this December. One Spider-Man book, within the top 15 last year's December (which I think was because there was only one Amazing published that month due to it being an extra sized issue, don't remember that well). One year before that, we have once again three Spider-Man books within the top 25 of December. And so on.
 

goldenarms

Well-Known Member
GenocideHeart said:
Lord Raine said:
LightningHunter said:
You have to get up really early in the morning to draw worse than Rob Liefield, but whoever is responsible for this is a true champion of shitty drawing.
That'd be Romita Jr.
Oh, God, I hate his artstyle. I had come to associate Spectacular Spider-Man with Romita Jr, because of that awful blocky feel of his characters, and refused to pick up any of the title. Wasn't too thrilled when he started work on Uncanny X-Men, either.
 

Ordo

Well-Known Member
TC_Hazard said:
Ordo said:
TC_Hazard said:
Prince Charon said:
Ghostface said:
<a href='http://www.bleedingcool.com/2011/12/10/fanboy-rampage-jms-vs-steve-wacker/' target='_blank' rel='nofollow'>How the fuck did I miss this?</a>á God, I love Mark Waid.
To be fair, if the numbers are accurate, then the current creative team is very likely doing something wrong, and isn't fixing it.
The chart by its own admission uses the lowest selling issue per month. Plus, economical stuff.

Truth is even after OMD, Spider-Man has been one of Marvel's top selling books.

Sidenote: Mark Waid is awesome.
Then by all means give a rebuttal using the highest, I'd be curious about the numbers, rather than descending into a flame war.
As I don't work in Marvel, I don't know the numbers. The best I could do would be looking up Diamond estimates, which would be investing far more effort in this than it deserves.

Does it really matter though? Even in one of the links you have given, one can see there are three Spider-Man books in the top 25 books this December. One Spider-Man book, within the top 15 last year's December (which I think was because there was only one Amazing published that month due to it being an extra sized issue, don't remember that well). One year before that, we have once again three Spider-Man books within the top 25 of December. And so on.
Then that is the reply they should've given. Post the data and leave it at that, attacking JMS (no matter if he's right or wrong) dose nothing but start a screaming match.
 

TC_Hazard

Well-Known Member
Ordo said:
TC_Hazard said:
Ordo said:
TC_Hazard said:
Prince Charon said:
Ghostface said:
<a href='http://www.bleedingcool.com/2011/12/10/fanboy-rampage-jms-vs-steve-wacker/' target='_blank' rel='nofollow'>How the fuck did I miss this?</a>á God, I love Mark Waid.
To be fair, if the numbers are accurate, then the current creative team is very likely doing something wrong, and isn't fixing it.
The chart by its own admission uses the lowest selling issue per month. Plus, economical stuff.

Truth is even after OMD, Spider-Man has been one of Marvel's top selling books.

Sidenote: Mark Waid is awesome.
Then by all means give a rebuttal using the highest, I'd be curious about the numbers, rather than descending into a flame war.
As I don't work in Marvel, I don't know the numbers. The best I could do would be looking up Diamond estimates, which would be investing far more effort in this than it deserves.

Does it really matter though? Even in one of the links you have given, one can see there are three Spider-Man books in the top 25 books this December. One Spider-Man book, within the top 15 last year's December (which I think was because there was only one Amazing published that month due to it being an extra sized issue, don't remember that well). One year before that, we have once again three Spider-Man books within the top 25 of December. And so on.
Then that is the reply they should've given. Post the data and leave it at that, attacking JMS (no matter if he's right or wrong) dose nothing but start a screaming match.
Honestly, I don't really see it. If someone is going to bash your work, then you have a right to get angry. Are there more dignified ways of handling the situation? Yeah. But I am not about to tell people how they should handle insults in Facebook.
 

atlas_hugged

Well-Known Member
Ordo said:
Then that is the reply they should've given. Post the data and leave it at that, attacking JMS (no matter if he's right or wrong) dose nothing but start a screaming match.
True, but trolling to begin with also tends to start screaming matches. The greater portion of blame usually lies with the people who troll, not those who get trolled.
 

Ordo

Well-Known Member
The extent of JMS trolling was to post a chart and then the words 'Just saying...'

The only reply required was a chart that counters the one posted by JMS and the words 'Just clarifying...'

Going into a tirade about it does nothing, and this isn't somethig a professional representative of a company (or a person who can be percieved as one) should be caught doing. Yes people get angry, but we're adults and having JMS spout an opinion based on flawed data is not enough justification to go off the deep end. If you have to, stand up and walk away from your computer before posting. Take some time to consider what you are going to say and how it will look in the end.

A reasoned, accurate response to JMS post would've been more useful than the current situation. Especially since it shows how the most important people, the customers actually feel about the current state of affairs.

And in the end, they're the ones whose opinions matter.
 

atlas_hugged

Well-Known Member
You seem to be measuring the extent of a troll in the amount of words he posts. (Also, falling prey to the classic troll trap of implying something, then denying the implication to appear "innocent")
 

TC_Hazard

Well-Known Member
ucal said:
You seem to be measuring the extent of a troll in the amount of words he posts. (Also, falling prey to the classic troll trap of implying something, then denying the implication to appear "innocent")
It's a bit of a double standard. People get all weird about people they perceive as 'professionals' doing stuff like this.

Hell, this is common for Wacker. A bit surprised at JMS. Didn't expect him to pull such a dick move.
 

Ordo

Well-Known Member
I expect the representative of a company to show more thought and tact than the average internet poster. I am fairly sure that the US Military has guidlines on what can and can not be posted on various social media sites because they do not want a single person (or group of people) making them all look bad. A difficult task considering the wide range of ages, backgrouds and personalities that are currently in the US military.

How you present yourself online is imortant for an organization. Look at the recent flap with Ocean Marketing. A bit more courtesy and professionalism would've seen that entire debacle avoided. However, the OM rep decided to get an attitude and the whole thing went down hill from there.

Now I am not saying this incident will harm Marvel's business, but a lack of restraint on the parts of some of it's employees could eventually cause a problem. Which is why I am encouraging calm and reasoned responses that adress the issue raised without turning into tirades.
 

TC_Hazard

Well-Known Member
Can't agree with that. Marvel ain't the military, and what their workers want to do in their Facebook accounts or elsewhere in the internet is their business.
 
I never found why people thought JMS was so great. Dude declares boldly that he'll take on Superman and Wonder Woman and everyone praises him. Drops them both after a year with mess ridden plots, and forced other writers to clean up after him. (Superman: Grounded, or at least the parts JMS wrote was fucking terrible. Refute this, I dare you.)

Personally on this issue, I think JMS was a being a dick with the chart, and was happy to see Mark Waid and the folks at Marvel slap him down a bit.
 

atlas_hugged

Well-Known Member
Ordo said:
I expect the representative of a company to show more thought and tact than the average internet poster. I am fairly sure that the US Military has guidlines on what can and can not be posted on various social media sites because they do not want a single person (or group of people) making them all look bad. A difficult task considering the wide range of ages, backgrouds and personalities that are currently in the US military.

How you present yourself online is imortant for an organization. Look at the recent flap with Ocean Marketing. A bit more courtesy and professionalism would've seen that entire debacle avoided. However, the OM rep decided to get an attitude and the whole thing went down hill from there.

Now I am not saying this incident will harm Marvel's business, but a lack of restraint on the parts of some of it's employees could eventually cause a problem. Which is why I am encouraging calm and reasoned responses that adress the issue raised without turning into tirades.
And I'd agree with you in this case, if what the Marvel employees did was anywhere near as bad and unprovoked as what the Ocean Marketing douchebag did. The analogy you're attempting to make there is ludicrous.

Anyways, if anything, your argument just lends further support to the idea that JMS is most at fault here, or at least that his actions are the least desirable for a corporation looking for professional behavior. Would you hire a man with a history of badmouthing employers in an extremely public setting (I don't know how many people he has following his facebook, but I'd imagine it's a lot) after the terms of their employment are done?
 

Ordo

Well-Known Member
I don't care whose more at fault, I'm disappointed in both sides, but the guys at Marvel could've easily ignored or handled this in a much better fashion. When you are in the spotlight, as they are, and your words reflect on you and the organization. Ocean Marketing is just the next most recent example of this I coul think of and it's something I am getting tired of seeing from grown adults.

Someone posts something that annoys a memeber of an organization and they feel compelled to respond. However, they quickly fall to insults and yelling which isn't really solving anything or doing anything to improve the company's image. Yes this was on facebook, and in all honesty since it was just JMS talking on his facebook page the whole thing could've been ignored by the guys at marvel. If they're really doing that well than nothing JMS says is going to hurt sales. However if they felt that they had to respond a simple post of sales figures was all that was required.

I am sick and tired of people yelling at each other when we should be capable of calmly discussing our difference, and respectfully disagreeing with one another. Had the mavel guys either ignored it, or just posted the actual sales figures the entire thing would've blown over very quickly without further comment.
 

Prince Charon

Well-Known Member
The fact that they didn't post sales facts in rebuttal (but did reply) kind of implies that the facts wouldn't have helped their side.
 
Top