Naruto No Rules, No Rulers [Naruto/High School DxD]

Jomasten

Well-Known Member
There is a reason why I go out of my way to say 'member of a Peerage' instead of 'servant'.
 

T.L

Well-Known Member
The Brave Saints system only begins between volumes 4 and 6.
In volume 6 life 1 part 2, Irina states that The Underworld and Heaven scientists collaborated to invent the Brave Saints system.
It appears that Irina is one of the first new angels as she is Michael's ace.
 

Nasuren

Well-Known Member
John At Dawn said:
Nasuren said:
Can you guarantee it? Issei might be guaranteed to choose yes, but can you guarantee that Kiba's hatred for being used and Gaspard fear of the unknown be overcome for them to say 'yes'?
Yes.

Look, don't get me wrong. Odds are that three of them saying 'yes' is favorable, it's just the idea that someone saying that a character is basically better off being forced to be a servant/slave of a character without a choice rubs me the wrong way. The peerage system draws a lot of parallels to a certain practice that's now considered illegal in most countries in my eyes.
And now we come to the source of the problem. It most certainly is not as bad as you make it sound. There are apparent rules on how one is and is not allowed to treat their peerage. For instance, once it came to light that Kuroka killed her former master because he wanted to experiment on her and Koneko, the charges against her where dropped.
Said example and Diodora Astaroth's peerages prove that the rules aren't that effective.

Regarding the question of whether or not being reincarnated was good for them, one thing can't really be doubted: they did not have the opportunity to make an informed decision. That is an objective fact, however meaningless you may find it. I remember one story where someone else was present when Rias was going to reincarnate Asia, and he interrupted her because of that, saying that, for all they knew, it would be horribly against her wishes.
While Issei's death seemed enivitable, I just don't like the idea that Rias pops a piece in the others at the last minute when she could have popped up a minute before and got them some emergency medicine.

High class devils trade their servants depending on the wishes of the servants, most likely. It doesn't make a lot of sense to trade away a loyal servant for one who doesn't want to work for you, that's just asking for all kinds of trouble. If it is done, it's probably considered the mark of a poor king.
...it's not like they have a choice. If a member of a peerage runs away, it's labeled as a stray devil and hunted down, remember?
 

MastaofBitches

Well-Known Member
The Brave Saints System get's a Pass because they are only turning people who are already their servants. Member's of the Church, who see becoming an Angel as a blessing. They aren't picking random people up of the street. Pretty sure the members of the church also volunteer for it.
 

l3fty

Well-Known Member
MastaofBitches said:
The Brave Saints System get's a Pass because they are only turning people who are already their servants. Member's of the Church, who see becoming an Angel as a blessing. They aren't picking random people up of the street. Pretty sure the members of the church also volunteer for it.
More like, they need pure minded people if they don't intend to end up with plenty of fallen angels. Irina tends to waver into black wings when she starts thinking of Issei and baby making.

Not that Irina can't have said babies, they just need to go into it for pure purposes of procreation and love after some rituals to lower their "dirty" thoughts and get into proper mood by those standards.
 

MastaofBitches

Well-Known Member
Irina really should have picked a better potential father than a living embodiment of perversion then.
 

Jomasten

Well-Known Member
Nasuren said:
John At Dawn said:
Nasuren said:
Can you guarantee it? Issei might be guaranteed to choose yes, but can you guarantee that Kiba's hatred for being used and Gaspard fear of the unknown be overcome for them to say 'yes'?
Yes.

Look, don't get me wrong. Odds are that three of them saying 'yes' is favorable, it's just the idea that someone saying that a character is basically better off being forced to be a servant/slave of a character without a choice rubs me the wrong way. The peerage system draws a lot of parallels to a certain practice that's now considered illegal in most countries in my eyes.
And now we come to the source of the problem. It most certainly is not as bad as you make it sound. There are apparent rules on how one is and is not allowed to treat their peerage. For instance, once it came to light that Kuroka killed her former master because he wanted to experiment on her and Koneko, the charges against her where dropped.
Said example and Diodora Astaroth's peerages prove that the rules aren't that effective.
Uh-huh. And it's not just Diodora being just plain 'lulz evulz', because he was written that way. He seems more like the type to put on a facade to show the world he's an upright and upstanding devil who follows the rul-oh wait.

Regarding the question of whether or not being reincarnated was good for them, one thing can't really be doubted: they did not have the opportunity to make an informed decision. That is an objective fact, however meaningless you may find it. I remember one story where someone else was present when Rias was going to reincarnate Asia, and he interrupted her because of that, saying that, for all they knew, it would be horribly against her wishes.
While Issei's death seemed enivitable, I just don't like the idea that Rias pops a piece in the others at the last minute when she could have popped up a minute before and got them some emergency medicine.
You don't like the fact, except that's exactly what happens, which is why its fact.

Also, it's not like Rias just so happens to be carrying any sort of so-called 'emergency medicine' on her person. And the time it takes for Rias to make a teleportation circle to bring them medical attention, they'll already be dead by then, more or less forcing her to use a Piece to save them anyway. She could certainly try to heal them, but depending on how far gone they were, it would still be moot, even more so if she shucked her clothes to apply the stronger version by skin-to-skin contact right there on the goddamn snow, or the middle of street or in an abandoned church.

High class devils trade their servants depending on the wishes of the servants, most likely. It doesn't make a lot of sense to trade away a loyal servant for one who doesn't want to work for you, that's just asking for all kinds of trouble. If it is done, it's probably considered the mark of a poor king.
...it's not like they have a choice. If a member of a peerage runs away, it's labeled as a stray devil and hunted down, remember?
Oh fucking gee, Kiba sure got labeled a stray devil and hunted down because he ran away from his Peerage in pursuit of his own agenda, wasn't he.
 

Smuthunter

Well-Known Member
Nasuren said:
Said example and Diodora Astaroth's peerages prove that the rules aren't that effective.
Outliers do not define a set. Find more examples, like a pervading trend within devil society, and then we'll talk about this. You won't find it though because that's not what Ishibumi was going for.

While Issei's death seemed enivitable, I just don't like the idea that Rias pops a piece in the others at the last minute when she could have popped up a minute before and got them some emergency medicine.
Right, because Rias carries a magical defibrillator around in her purse, right between her wallet and her cell phone. :snigger: Oh, and it has miracle cure-all powers that works on everything from poison gas to stab wounds.

Please think about your arguments before you make them.

...it's not like they have a choice. If a member of a peerage runs away, it's labeled as a stray devil and hunted down, remember?
You completely ignored my point that they probably do have a choice because the ruling powers want willing servants who want to climb the power structure and become more high-class devils, number one. Number two, there are exactly two stray devils in the whole series, three if you count the anime. Of those, one (or two) are power-crazed monsters eating human souls, and the third was charged with murdering her master. "Running away" is not demonstrated to be a trigger condition for this status.
 

KurokamiDG

Well-Known Member
And I'm pretty sure that the normal means of a Devil getting a member of their peerage involves them asking people if they wish to join. Rias is different because the people that joined her had no place else to go and was in no position to deny her, but they still chose to join.

Nasu, I'm starting to think that you just have a negative opinion for DxD Devils in general. There are only a few Devils that don't go with the established system one of the 4 Satans made and they are very polarizing just for being so fucking evil. You really can't judge Rias's unintentional method of getting members when she hasn't done anything necessarily bad to get them.

On another note, how goes it with the next chapter MoB? Did you find a good way to portray Naruto's POV concerning this whole debacle with Rias?
 

MastaofBitches

Well-Known Member
I haven't even started because you lot have me thoroughly confused, and I need to completely rework my original idea for this chapter, since it, apparently, is considered bashing.
 

KurokamiDG

Well-Known Member
MastaofBitches said:
I haven't even started because you lot have me thoroughly confused, and I need to completely rework my original idea for this chapter, since it, apparently, is considered bashing.
:sweat:

Well, although it was completely unintentional, it does help that more people are taking an interest in the story. It helps that most wanna see you avoid going into bashing too...so there's positives to this big argument we've got going on.

Hopefully.
 

Smuthunter

Well-Known Member
Basically, if you see one time where Rias appears to be acting like a manipulative bitch but all the other times she appears she's a loving and wonderful person, it is probably better to interpret the outlier in terms of her real characterization rather than saying "See, this one time Rias appears to have possibly been acting like a bitch depending on your point of view is her true character!" The same goes for devil society and most other things.
 

MastaofBitches

Well-Known Member
I entire point was Naruto distrusting Rias because he doesn't have all the facts. But I can't do that, because it's character bashing.
 

Smuthunter

Well-Known Member
MastaofBitches said:
I entire point was Naruto distrusting Rias because he doesn't have all the facts. But I can't do that, because it's character bashing.
That depends on how you handle the situation. Showing the scene prominently from Rias's perspective would probably help - make her confusion obvious, lay the facts out for the reader the way she sees them so that Naruto doesn't come across as a mouthpiece of righteous indignation. Otherwise most of your readers will probably assume that Naruto is automatically in the right just because he's upset - that's how the FF.net fanbase tends to operate, sadly.
 
KurokamiDG said:
Nasu, I'm starting to think that you just have a negative opinion for DxD Devils in general.
I figured that out two pages ago.

MastaofBitches said:
I haven't even started because you lot have me thoroughly confused, and I need to completely rework my original idea for this chapter, since it, apparently, is considered bashing.
Maybe we're giving the wrong impression here.

It's fine if Naruto is pissed about the situation with Issei, and thinks Rias manipulated the events. Just as long as it becomes clear that he's wrong.
 

Jomasten

Well-Known Member
MastaofBitches said:
I entire point was Naruto distrusting Rias because he doesn't have all the facts. But I can't do that, because it's character bashing.
To be fair, I thought that you actually were going to have her be some sort of manipulative bitch who had a plan for everything. On both Naruto's and her perspective. I guess it's much more...tolerance is too weak a word... acceptable, I guess, if it is instead some huge misunderstanding and incorrect facts that, hopefully, gets corrected or straightened out.

I've browsed through enough DxD xover badfics where the protagonist/author SI, with way too many tags than appropriately necessary, bashes on Rias by having everything she's ever done in her life be wrong, constantly undermining her struggles/achievements by calling her a manipulative bitch/spoiled brat, and then having Rias bend over and just take it 'just because the main character is the paragon of virtue and what's right and she's not', and then maybe be a member of their harem, which is obviously better than Issei's because 'the protagonist is an ineffable author SI who can do no wrong/a tragic figure trying to understand themselves' and Issei's just a worthless pervert who was given everything on a silver platter, despite the fact he actually had to struggle to get to the level where he was.
 

MastaofBitches

Well-Known Member
The way things were supposed to go down, was Naruto is immensely distrusting towards Rias, and is consistently pulling pranks on the ORC to gauge their reactions. It was supposed to all come to a head after the incident with Asia, at which point both sides explode at each other and things get, mostly, resolved. Naturally there would still be some underlying tension, and in no way would the two become fast friends.
 

Smuthunter

Well-Known Member
Then you'll want to show the confrontation from both of their perspectives. You'll also probably want to add a note in the authors' notes that Naruto is completely in the wrong just to make it extra-clear to your readers that you're not taking his side or using him as a mouthpiece. (Remember kids, only you can kill bad fanon!)

I would also expect Rias to forgive Naruto pretty quickly once the misunderstanding is cleared up, and Naruto can make friends with just about anyone. If Naruto is acting against them because he thought a friend was in trouble... that's a thing Rias can sympathize with.
 

KurokamiDG

Well-Known Member
The only one who I'd believe would still be wary about Naruto after its all said and done is Koneko.

Speaking of her, is she able to sense that Naruto has an affect on nature or not? That'll be an issue if she can.
 

Nasuren

Well-Known Member
Nasu, I'm starting to think that you just have a negative opinion for DxD Devils in general.
I have a negative opinion for politicians. What you see is me playing the devil's advocate and saying that the devils ain't perfect. You guys say that Astaroth's was one of the odd ones that didn't conformed to the rules? Let me ask you, how many Peerage's have we seen? Six, wasn't it? Two of which were treated as the owner's harem.

Take it as you will.

Oh fucking gee, Kiba sure got labeled a stray devil and hunted down because he ran away from his Peerage in pursuit of his own agenda, wasn't he.
Stray Devils
Stray Devils (はぐれ悪魔 Hagure Akuma) are Devils who have diverted away from their masters. Without their masters to keep their powers in check, they become a great threat if their powers go beyond their control. The Devils take this case very seriously, and any Devil who becomes a Stray will be killed on the spot. The only known Stray Devils in the series are Viser and Kuroka, the latter coming from the Vali Team.


The way things were supposed to go down, was Naruto is immensely distrusting towards Rias, and is consistently pulling pranks on the ORC to gauge their reactions. It was supposed to all come to a head after the incident with Asia, at which point both sides explode at each other and things get, mostly, resolved. Naturally there would still be some underlying tension, and in no way would the two become fast friends.
...except I don't see his pranks being all that effective inside the ORC after a certain point. They might be hiding the facts that they are devils, but I don't think that Rias isn't incapable to set up something that could ruin Naruto's pranking run. A simple video of Naruto setting up a prank in the ORC is enough to land him some official disciplinary action by itself.
 
Nasuren said:
I have a negative opinion for politicians. What you see is me playing the devil's advocate after reading Tate no Yuusha no Nariagari and saying that the devils ain't perfect.
...Your justification for how you are interpreting the characters from one series is because you read a completely different series?
 

Nasuren

Well-Known Member
John At Dawn said:
Nasuren said:
I have a negative opinion for politicians. What you see is me playing the devil's advocate after reading Tate no Yuusha no Nariagari and saying that the devils ain't perfect.
...Your justification for how you are interpreting the characters from one series is because you read a completely different series?
Out of the whole thing, and you latched on something I posted by accident?
 
Nasuren said:
Out of the whole thing, and you latched on something I posted by accident?
...Right. Accident. You realize you have no way to prove that and I have no reason to believe you, right?
 

Nasuren

Well-Known Member
John At Dawn said:
Nasuren said:
Out of the whole thing, and you latched on something I posted by accident?
...Right. Accident. You realize you have no way to prove that and I have no reason to believe you, right?
And you realize that I have nothing to prove nor care what you believe about me?

Speaking of her, is she able to sense that Naruto has an affect on nature or not? That'll be an issue if she can.
...wasn't DxD Senjutsu pretty much chakra in Naruto?
 

Smuthunter

Well-Known Member
Nasuren said:
I have a negative opinion for politicians. What you see is me playing the devil's advocate and saying that the devils ain't perfect.
The problem is that you're taking isolated incidents and turning them into defining trends in the interest of painting the characters in a negative light. That's character bashing (or in this case faction bashing).

Mind you, I wouldn't mind the factions being a little more rounded out with more defined flaws than they are demonstrated to have, but this is not the way to do it. Painting the peerage system as systemized slavery goes way past the devils being flawed and into the realm of moustache-twirling evil.

You guys say that Astaroth's was one of the odd ones that didn't conformed to the rules? Let me ask you, how many Peerage's have we seen? Six, wasn't it? Two of which were treated as the owner's harem.

Take it as you will.
And in only one of those are the girls indicated to be abused or mistreated at all. Raiser's pieces don't show any signs of being anything less than 100% loyal to him regardless of Raiser's own character flaws. Once again, the outlier does not define the set.
 
Top