The views of the TSAB in Nanoha

PCHeintz72

The Sentient Fanfic Search Engine mk II
#76
Rising Dragon said:
Actually, PC, I think you're just trying to argue that the Bureau and its use of magic in society is inherently malevolent.
Not really... I was talking in general terms... The exact same statements would be made by me were we talking Sailor moon or Slayers... Sailor Saturns Silence Glaive is not remotely safe... and I would argue since they show Usagi and Usa using mind control, they are not really safe to be around either... The Silence Glaive is 'safe' by the terminology being used here merely because she is unlikely to kill a planet with her on it and her baseline personality... That does *NOT* make a weapon safe or change any properties about it or its capabilities.

Again... I quite simply do not agree with the concept of 'Safe' as being applied here. It is conceptually wrong and incorrect to imply safe or dangerous to an object that can do nothing except by the will of the wielder... (Again, leaving rune weapons and enslaved AI's out of this discussion for simplicity)

It still boils to will, the magic in no way shape or form is any safer in a deranged killer as a defender of Justice... it is in the actions of those *using* it that it becomes safe or not safe...

Even a sleep spell is not really 'safe'... if you say put someone to sleep whom is driving a bus or flying a plane... you can use that spell classed as 'Safe' to kill a wack ton of people.

it is again will and intent of the user...


In TSAB area of influence you just won't get stuff like school shootings or IEDs being used to kill people because mass-based weaponry is forbidden and strictly controlled while TSAB usually keeps tabs on the more powerful magic users. It's pretty much like it would be if governments could enforce absolute Gun-Control, nobody except police and army would have them, neither civilians nor criminals, that way the threat level of criminals drops significantly.
That is again falling back on the intent of the users, not the spells themselves, and there is no way the TSAB control all magic wielding people... Fate is the perfect example of someone slipping through the cracks...
 

ragnarok1337

Well-Known Member
#77
Are people really still arguing with PCHeintz again? We already know he has a wild hate-on for the TSAB, and no amount of evidence will convince him otherwise. Just stop posting people. If that makes him think he's "won" by driving us away, that's his delusion. I for one will not be replying to anything of his. Sure, PCH, you can go ahead and think you've won, or make a "scathing" comment or something and pat yourself on the back when I don't reply. I'm gone.
 

PCHeintz72

The Sentient Fanfic Search Engine mk II
#78
ragnarok1337 said:
Are people really still arguing with PCHeintz again? We already know he has a wild hate-on for the TSAB, and no amount of evidence will convince him otherwise. Just stop posting people. If that makes him think he's "won" by driving us away, that's his delusion. I for one will not be replying to anything of his. Sure, PCH, you can go ahead and think you've won, or make a "scathing" comment or something and pat yourself on the back when I don't reply. I'm gone.
Shrugs...

My issue with this latest argument has nothing to do with the so called 'hate-on' you think I have for them... or any of the earlier points in this thread.

It is a conceptual issue I have with terming Magic itself 'Safe' when it is clearly the users intent that makes it 'safe' or not...

I've pointed out it makes no difference whether we are discussing MGLN or say Slayers or Sailor Moon or even some sci fi show... the concept itself is flat out fundamentally flawed.
 

Kaijo

Well-Known Member
#79
PCHeintz, we understand your argument of "safe." I have attempted to state your argument before, which amounts to "Magic is not 100% safe because it depends on the will of the caster" correct? And you are right about that.

But here is what you aren't acknowledging: Magic is safer than normal tech, because magic gives you the option to subdue without harm. Tech doesn't.

And don't mention any other magical girl show, or Slayers, or anything else. Nanoha magic is specifically stated and shown to have both lethal and non-lethal settings. Lina's Fireball has no such guarantee. So you can't bring any other magic into this; you have to stick with this universe's explanation of magic and its rules.

Yes, Magic can kill. But with a magic staff, I can bring you down from a mile away while you're standing in a crowd, with no harm to any building or person around you. I can't do that with any tech.

Your argument of "but but but... magic can still kill!" is falling on deaf ears, because we know that already. We have no idea where you want to go with this point. If your goal is to show tech is better, well, you still have work to do. Because, so far, you have provided no evidence that tech is better.

The Bureau chose magic because it gives them non-lethal options, and it is cleaner. And it doesn't put power into the hands of anyone who wants it.

To draw some real life analogies for why this is wanted, consider the US's war in Iraq. We were there to "win the peace" although you can draw conclusions about how effective or earnest that idea was. Still, we wanted to free the population, and defeat the terrorists. Problem is, the terrorists looked just like every other Iraqi. And they'd mingle in with the crowds and attack our troops. If our troops fired back, we'd end up killing innocents and turning people against us (happened several times). We tried other methods, like water hoses, tear gas, etc. Anything to disperse mobs without killing. It was damn difficult.

If the US had magic, it could simply stun an entire crowd, then careful move them all apart with 0 loss of life. Wouldn't that be easier and safer? Can you respond to this point at the very least, and concede that Nanohaverse magic holds a vast advantage in this case?
 

PCHeintz72

The Sentient Fanfic Search Engine mk II
#80
Your argument of "but but but... magic can still kill!" is falling on deaf ears, because we know that already. We have no idea where you want to go with this point. If your goal is to show tech is better, well, you still have work to do. Because, so far, you have provided no evidence that tech is better.
I am *not* saying tech is better.

That has never been my goal. The only advantage tech has is it is *not* dependent upon magical potential, and thus equally available to all... as a means to an end, whether that be to attack, or defend, or not use, is up to the will of the user... Ditto flying, instead of flying spell, have a helicopter, etc...

I've said from the start that terming magic as 'safe' is fundamentally *wrong*... it is all but *grammatically* and *contextually* incorrect. It is only safe in context of what the user decided. That it can still kill does not make it less or more safe.

In that respect, whether using technology or magic, the intent of the user is the same... the *effectiveness* and/or solution may be different. Aka:

- a sleep spell on someone instead of knockout gas or chloroform.
- a binding spell instead of handcuffs. I should point out a binding spell can be far more deadly and dangerous than handcuffs... you can at least in theory rip someone apart with a binding spell, not so handcuffs.
- a fireball instead of a sniper rifle (or for non-lethal purposes, a non-lethal fireball vs. a tranquilizer dart gun).

The Bureau chose magic because it gives them non-lethal options, and it is cleaner. And it doesn't put power into the hands of anyone who wants it.
This approach has its own drawbacks... as it allows at least in concept for advancement by those with magical abilities that are closed to those without. It is not really a fair system when taken as a whole. But then, neither is real life.

Note also banning specific types of weapons really does no good, as it merely takes them out of the hands of in this case the law abiding citizen whom could use them to help. A criminal mind could likely still get their hands on anything they want, if not in TSAB space, then smuggling in from other realms.

To draw some real life analogies for why this is wanted, consider the US's war in Iraq. We were there to "win the peace" although you can draw conclusions about how effective or earnest that idea was. Still, we wanted to free the population, and defeat the terrorists.
Well... I felt it more we were there for the oil... but lets not bring politics into it.

Problem is, the terrorists looked just like every other Iraqi. And they'd mingle in with the crowds and attack our troops. If our troops fired back, we'd end up killing innocents and turning people against us (happened several times). We tried other methods, like water hoses, tear gas, etc. Anything to disperse mobs without killing. It was damn difficult.

If the U.S. had magic, it could simply stun an entire crowd, then careful move them all apart with 0 loss of life. Wouldn't that be easier and safer? Can you respond to this point at the very least, and concede that Nanohaverse magic holds a vast advantage in this case?
Well... No, because that statement mixes Nanoha fictional and U.S. real world scenarios, the two are not overly compatible because the TSAB rules all Midchildan society. you would be talking magical action by U.S. forces while in another country.

Keep in mind the current worldwide government works at least in large part to a balance of power... tanks, aircraft, computers, missiles, guns, spies, etc... to differing levels, most nations on the planet can get, or have, or are hiding, all of these and know how to use them and the consequences. The main reason there has not been any major wars is those foolish enough to start them (rather than just be dumb and threaten them) have been minor powers in comparison to the major 1st world countries.

The introduction of magic into an environment like this is I think very bad, and here is why:

1st... if all governments had magic, then I would well imagine a whole new frontier of magical lore would come into play in regards to the balance of power. What I mean is if we could so easily put a area wide sleep spell on a foreign government or terrorists... there would be a search to discover countermeasures to prevent it. Ditto mind reading and nearly anything else for that matter. I would imagine it would get quite nasty. Like if they tried using it to give and resist torture techniques.

2nd... if *only* the US had magic, I would be very afraid, as I do not believe the U.S. government capable of restraining itself with such power... not to mention, other governments out of fear would want to restore the balance of power... it would either create a bloodbath, or it would create what I've heard some call a 'scramble'... where everyone around the world not the U.S. would descend on it until they had the capability as well or at least a capability to undo/resist/prevent it... be it with counter magic, or technology.

We've actually seen this play out in MGLN... after all, to combat magic, they have the null zones and nullifying gadget devices...

We could as a worst case have magic be the starting point of a global war over Magic, or if it held off long enough... a global war using magic.

Don't believe it could come to this? I'll remind you of Belkan society in MGLN... its rise, and collapse, and why...
 

keroko

Well-Known Member
#81
PCHeintz72 said:
Again... I quite simply do not agree with the concept of 'Safe' as being applied here. It is conceptually wrong and incorrect to imply safe or dangerous to an object that can do nothing except by the will of the wielder... (Again, leaving rune weapons and enslaved AI's out of this discussion for simplicity)

It still boils to will, the magic in no way shape or form is any safer in a deranged killer as a defender of Justice... it is in the actions of those *using* it that it becomes safe or not safe...
The weird thing is, using your logic, the word safe cannot be applied to anything in this world, as anything in this world can be used to kill someone regardless of how safe people call it. Yet, clearly we do call things safe.

I would say the flaw lies in your logic rather than the usage of the word safe.
 

ragnarok1337

Well-Known Member
#82
keroko said:
The weird thing is, using your logic, the word safe cannot be applied to anything in this world, as anything in this world can be used to kill someone regardless of how safe people call it. Yet, clearly we do call things safe.

I would say the flaw lies in your logic rather than the usage of the word safe.
[video=youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8f_mE7Zc5w[/video]
 

Kaijo

Well-Known Member
#83
PCHeintz72 said:
I've said from the start that terming magic as 'safe' is fundamentally *wrong*... it is all but *grammatically* and *contextually* incorrect. It is only safe in context of what the user decided. That it can still kill does not make it less or more safe.
Okay, as Keroko said, then, in your view, nothing is safe. Even a pillow isn't safe, because someone can suffocate you by holding it over your face. What you're missing, is that there are degrees of "safe" and to try and lump everything into the same "non-safe" category devalues the "safe" term of any meaning whatsoever. You'd be equating a grenade to be as safe as a Divine Buster, and that simply isn't true; A Divine Buster really is much safer than a grenade.

So what exactly are you advocating, then? Do you think the Bureau should have gone with normal tech, then, instead of magic? Do you think nothing in society can be labeled safe, because everything can be used to harm or kill? Would you stand on the corner and warn people that pillows aren't safe, because they can be used to kill? Would you tell parents that legos aren't safe because you step on them, hurt you foot, which causes you to fall and hit your head and kill yourself?

This approach has its own drawbacks... as it allows at least in concept for advancement by those with magical abilities that are closed to those without. It is not really a fair system when taken as a whole. But then, neither is real life.

Note also banning specific types of weapons really does no good, as it merely takes them out of the hands of in this case the law abiding citizen whom could use them to help. A criminal mind could likely still get their hands on anything they want, if not in TSAB space, then smuggling in from other realms.
Perhaps they could. But magic means they have a much safer way of dealing with it. So, guns are smuggled in... we just stun all the guys with guns from a mile away... problem solved. Now, wasn't that a rather safe way of dealing with it? Or would you prefer citizens be armed with guns and end up shooting each other and their families? Because I can pull up statistics that show that a household with a gun, is between 5 and 8 times more likely to be subject to gun violence by that very gun.

It's a personal choice, but personally, if I knew the police could take out bad guys and protect people easily via magic, I'd I'd go that route. Then again, I'm not someone who fears so much for my life that I feel a need to have a gun.

Perhaps you have a subconscious fear of magic, because you might lose your gun in such a situation? That, as a normal person, there is no way tech can match up against a mage?

Well... No, because that statement mixes Nanoha fictional and U.S. real world scenarios, the two are not overly compatible because the TSAB rules all Midchildan society. you would be talking magical action by U.S. forces while in another country.
Ooh, careful about that, because real world scenarios do play out in Nanoha. Orussia is currently embroiled in a nasty civil war... much like Syria. Complete with guns, missiles, grenades, child soldiers, rape, death, etc.

And both the Nanohaverse and our reality have a relatively small group of people that engage in killing, sometimes slaughtering large groups of people (like towns).

The introduction of magic into an environment like this is I think very bad, and here is why:

1st... if all governments had magic, then I would well imagine a whole new frontier of magical lore would come into play in regards to the balance of power. What I mean is if we could so easily put a area wide sleep spell on a foreign government or terrorists... there would be a search to discover countermeasures to prevent it. Ditto mind reading and nearly anything else for that matter. I would imagine it would get quite nasty. Like if they tried using it to give and resist torture techniques.
And... so? There are shields and barriers that protect against things. And we haven't seen a sleep spell that could knock out an entire country, let alone an entire planet. The scale of human existence currently overwhelms magic. The biggest threat is someone unleashing an Arc-En-CIel on a planet. And you can bet if the Bureau, or anyone else did that, they'd suddenly become a target by every other government. The threat of MAD would work quite well.

2nd... if *only* the US had magic, I would be very afraid, as I do not believe the U.S. government capable of restraining itself with such power... not to mention, other governments out of fear would want to restore the balance of power... it would either create a bloodbath, or it would create what I've heard some call a 'scramble'... where everyone around the world not the U.S. would descend on it until they had the capability as well or at least a capability to undo/resist/prevent it... be it with counter magic, or technology.
The US spends more on it's military than the next 20 nations combined. No one can match up to us currently. And yet we haven't invaded every single country. What holds us back? Our economy is intermingled with the rest of the world. We've found it better to try and control the world with money, rather than arms.

So what if the US had magic? Well, if no one else did, it would be a rather large advantage. Which is the reason the Bureau went for magic, but they aren't the only ones. Not every mage is a part of the Bureau, and the Bureau doesn't run any planets. They just police the spaceways, contain dangerous lost logia, and investigate multi-planet spanning dangerous incidents. THey are just a space police force, probably paid for by taxes from multiple planets. They start acting dangerously, and they can kiss their funding goodbye.

Money > any sort of offensive capability.

We've actually seen this play out in MGLN... after all, to combat magic, they have the null zones and nullifying gadget devices...

We could as a worst case have magic be the starting point of a global war over Magic, or if it held off long enough... a global war using magic.

Don't believe it could come to this? I'll remind you of Belkan society in MGLN... its rise, and collapse, and why...
Except the Belkan wars had plenty of normal tech, so much so that it dwarfed magic. The Cradle could nullify magic totally within. But all the bad things, the destroyed planets and uninhabitable planets, was due to... non-magical tech! So, you really don't want to bring up the Belkan wars to try and support your "magic = bad" point, because it actually goes against it. Since the Bureau has instituted magic, there hasn't been any large-scale Belkan wars for several hundred years.
 

Akiyoshi

Well-Known Member
#84
Just the last statement is a bit vague, Belka used lots of mass-bassed tech indeed but therewere also lots of hybrd trch combining both aspects. The Cradle even in spite of AMF seems to be mana powered and also can empower the Sankt Kaiser's mana to absurd levels. Scaglietti's plan included reaching the moons of Mid-Childa to have an infinite supply of mana to use the Cradle's power to the fullest and held entire planets hostage.

It was one of the reasons why Belka was so feared, they had mastery over both technology AND magic and the means to use both to devastating effect. I wondered if the original Eclipse virus and the Bible of The Silver Cross were created as a countermeasure precisely to counter the lots of magical brokeness spread among belkan rulers.
 

PCHeintz72

The Sentient Fanfic Search Engine mk II
#85
Okay, as Keroko said, then, in your view, nothing is safe. Even a pillow isn't safe, because someone can suffocate you by holding it over your face. What you're missing, is that there are degrees of "safe" and to try and lump everything into the same "non-safe" category devalues the "safe" term of any meaning whatsoever. You'd be equating a grenade to be as safe as a Divine Buster, and that simply isn't true; A Divine Buster really is much safer than a grenade.
You and everyone else seem to be missing the concept that a normal object is always present, and as such a designation can be made of it, as it has existence of its own once made not really tied to anything else, even the maker. A pillow sitting on a bed is still there, it is not tied to my existence until someone picks it up...

Not so say a divine buster or other magical blast, which is tied to user will, it exists solely because of whomever called it, anything done with it, is by that person, its presence, is solely dependent upon will of user... its power is determined by that user, so it can have no such association of safe independent of the caller/user. As its safe or not safe classification is based on that caller/user, not on the object itself.

Using your table example, the table is safe, because it can do no harm in and of itself, my hurting itself on it, is by my actions, not the action of the table.

So what exactly are you advocating, then? Do you think the Bureau should have gone with normal tech, then, instead of magic?
I have repeatedly stated, I was never discussing that... they can do what they want as I certainly have no control over either Nanoha canon material, or its interpretation by fans...

Since you asked though... realistically, they should have adopted both (magic and tech)... rejecting something in whole merely because of bad past with it is not rational or practical... They open themselves up to a whole slew of potential issues by relying too much on one and banning portions of the other. I take a far more practical approach, use what works...

If a person wants to join TSAB and fight, but have little in way of magic, give them the tech, sniper guns, cannons, dart guns, cuffs, battle armor instead of barrier jacket, any other tech needed to get the job done etc....

if a person on Midchildean wants to defend their home and has little magic... allow for fences, pets, guns, perhaps limited like in the U.S., but whatever, perhaps a air filtration or detection / counter system for sleep spells, maybe electrified windows and doors, etc...

Perhaps they could. But magic means they have a much safer way of dealing with it. So, guns are smuggled in... we just stun all the guys with guns from a mile away... problem solved. Now, wasn't that a rather safe way of dealing with it? Or would you prefer citizens be armed with guns and end up shooting each other and their families? Because I can pull up statistics that show that a household with a gun, is between 5 and 8 times more likely to be subject to gun violence by that very gun.
This is not really a good way of thinking...

It first require they know about the guns, and assumes the user does not have defenses against being stunned.

It also assumes the people being shot at have the magic to defend themselves with. And a society magical based seems like it makes it less likely for a person with minimal magic to defend themselves. After all, as has been repeatedly implied in this thread, not everyone in Midchildean society is a power horse like Nanoha or Fate.

And both the Nanohaverse and our reality have a relatively small group of people that engage in killing, sometimes slaughtering large groups of people (like towns).
You are talking about the wrong one about that, because I am generally accused of looking at the Nanoha series with too dark a view.

It may be depressing to consider, but you must take into account that Nanoha universe is still run by humans... they may come from a magical society... that does *not* make it perfect. It is human nature for some to be greedy, or want what they cannot or should not, or take liberties they should not.

We have no shortage of examples from in series to those whom have become corrupt even in the government, so imagine outside of it.

I imagine whole new ways to mug, rape, assault, steal, and make war, give torture, blackmail, coerce, and so on all exist. I can easily see magic being used for such. Consider the possibility of someone magically restraining someone, abducting or teleporting them, having their way with them (not nessecarily rape, maybe extract passwords, codes, corporate espianige), then erasing memories and placing back on the street.

And Remember, we may have a generally officially accepted Geneva convention on prisoner treatment on this planet, that does not state they do...

It's a personal choice, but personally, if I knew the police could take out bad guys and protect people easily via magic, I'd I'd go that route. Then again, I'm not someone who fears so much for my life that I feel a need to have a gun.
Ahhh... but right or wrong, at least in the U.S., even with restrictions, you have that choice to make... this removes that choice. Which I do not feel is remotely fair to the lower half of society... but All but guarantees that the government cannot be taken out by a revolution.

Also, you are looking at only the good with the Government having magic... I do not exactly trust the government we currently have, but I trust them far more now than if they had power over magic...

And... so? There are shields and barriers that protect against things. And we haven't seen a sleep spell that could knock out an entire country, let alone an entire planet. The scale of human existence currently overwhelms magic. The biggest threat is someone unleashing an Arc-En-CIel on a planet.
You must not have a devious mind... Or I have a far more devious one than you...

Shields can be pierced or overwhelmed or otherwise gotten around like with teleportation. A mix of strategic magic and conventional tactics and weaponry could devastate large swaths of area... take for example a sleep spell being used in some of the control centers and then them being bombed...

And you can bet if the Bureau, or anyone else did that, they'd suddenly become a target by every other government. The threat of MAD would work quite well.
Bah... you would have to catch them doing it... with their ability to jump dimensions... unless it was witnessed, or it left some form of trace, how would you know. The threat of MAD only goes so far... I doubt there are many forces out there that could touch the TSAB.

So what if the US had magic? Well, if no one else did, it would be a rather large advantage. Which is the reason the Bureau went for magic, but they aren't the only ones. Not every mage is a part of the Bureau, and the Bureau doesn't run any planets. They just police the spaceways, contain dangerous lost logia, and investigate multi-planet spanning dangerous incidents. THey are just a space police force, probably paid for by taxes from multiple planets. They start acting dangerously, and they can kiss their funding goodbye.

Money > any sort of offensive capability.
Ahhh... you are not looking at the concept war is about resources... the funding that would be lost would be at least in part made up for by conquering territories, better if you owed that territory money, as you would not need to pay it back.

In fact, in a interstellar magical environment, funding takes a whole new meaning when you can get funding and raw materials from asteroids and uninhabited planets.

Except the Belkan wars had plenty of normal tech, so much so that it dwarfed magic.
This was already at least in part responded on, so I'm not bothering.
 

Kaijo

Well-Known Member
#86
Akiyoshi said:
Just the last statement is a bit vague, Belka used lots of mass-bassed tech indeed but therewere also lots of hybrd trch combining both aspects. The Cradle even in spite of AMF seems to be mana powered and also can empower the Sankt Kaiser's mana to absurd levels. Scaglietti's plan included reaching the moons of Mid-Childa to have an infinite supply of mana to use the Cradle's power to the fullest and held entire planets hostage.

It was one of the reasons why Belka was so feared, they had mastery over both technology AND magic and the means to use both to devastating effect. I wondered if the original Eclipse virus and the Bible of The Silver Cross were created as a countermeasure precisely to counter the lots of magical brokeness spread among belkan rulers.
And if you pay attention to Fate's monologue, and Erio and Caro's comments on it, you would have learned that it was the fearsome mass-based weapons which caused the worst and largest destruction. Stuff like the Cradle is impressive, but it was only one ship, and required a particular person to operate it. The nukes (and things like it), could be operated by any child (Erio's words).

PCHeintz72 said:
You and everyone else seem to be missing the concept that a normal object is always present, and as such a designation can be made of it, as it has existence of its own once made not really tied to anything else, even the maker. A pillow sitting on a bed is still there, it is not tied to my existence until someone picks it up...
Mana is always present, too. Not sure what your point is. Magic is a tool, much like anything else, including that pillow.

I have repeatedly stated, I was never discussing that... they can do what they want as I certainly have no control over either Nanoha canon material, or its interpretation by fans...
What is your point, then? Seriously. It seems to be that "magic isn't safe!" and that's it. Which has nothing to do with why the Bureau went the Belkan route. It's as if you don't really understand why the Bureau did, or that you feel the Bureau did wrong in going the magic route. AS if you don't quite know what the Belkan wars were like, and the differences between magic and normal tools, to understand why magic is simply better and more effective.

Since you asked though... realistically, they should have adopted both (magic and tech)... rejecting something in whole merely because of bad past with it is not rational or practical... They open themselves up to a whole slew of potential issues by relying too much on one and banning portions of the other. I take a far more practical approach, use what works...
This is where you don't quite understand the material; the Bureau DOES use a lot of normal tech. Vehicles, for one. They have tanks. They have guns (Runessa had a handgun). They are just under very strict control, and the Bureau tends to rely on magic mostly to handle things. Given the 150 years of peace, it has worked quite well. At least, compared to the 300+ years of horrible war in which normal tech destroyed planets and kills billions of people.

In that situation, if you can put yourself in their shoes, then, perhaps you can understand why they went with magic?

If a person wants to join TSAB and fight, but have little in way of magic, give them the tech, sniper guns, cannons, dart guns, cuffs, battle armor instead of barrier jacket, any other tech needed to get the job done etc....
Her name is Runessa. She's representative of what you might be thinking about. I suggest you read through Sound Stage X, and then you may have a better angle on the whole tech thing. She had a real gun (a device that shoots bullets), and a license to use it.

And battle armor may as well be tissue paper, for all the good it would defend against magic. Understand that you are saying: "Hey, let's toss this guy into the fight between the US and Iraqi tanks, and arm him with a stick! In fact, the US army should use more sticks, because guns aren't safe!"

Reading Sound Stage X, you'll also see how Erio shrugged off a rail gun shot with his barrier jacket alone, and how Subaru took High Explosive Anti-Tank round at near point blank range, and only had some of her barrier jacket shredded, but was otherwise unharmed.

Rock beats scissors, every single time. Magic beats tech, every single time. The only time tech ever got close, was Jail's drones, and they had to to use an AMF and extreme numbers to pose any kind of challenge. With training, the normal magic-using grunts could hold their own against vastly superior numbers. It took 3 cyborgs to even threaten Teana, a B-ranked mage, and she still took them out. The most advanced tech in the Nanohaverse, still pales in comparison to magic.

So, answer me honestly: Do you really think it is a wise idea to bring a stick to a gun fight?

if a person on Midchildean wants to defend their home and has little magic... allow for fences, pets, guns, perhaps limited like in the U.S., but whatever, perhaps a air filtration or detection / counter system for sleep spells, maybe electrified windows and doors, etc...
What makes you think they don't? Remember, Mid-Childa is an independent planet. The Bureau just has it's ground forces branch there. The Bureau is essentially a police force; they don't rule anyone. And so far, the planets in Bureau space seem to be content with how the Bureau has done things, and how they have kept the peace.

It also assumes the people being shot at have the magic to defend themselves with. And a society magical based seems like it makes it less likely for a person with minimal magic to defend themselves. After all, as has been repeatedly implied in this thread, not everyone in Midchildean society is a power horse like Nanoha or Fate.
You're all over the place with this comment, so much so that I'm not sure what you're saying. If a group of people have guns, it is a fairly safe bet they don't have much magic. Only a small percentage of the population has magical potential, so the odds are already good they are normal. And a magic shot that they don't see coming, means they can't defend against it.

And both the Nanohaverse and our reality have a relatively small group of people that engage in killing, sometimes slaughtering large groups of people (like towns).
You are talking about the wrong one about that, because I am generally accused of looking at the Nanoha series with too dark a view.
Nanoha Force. Whole villages and groups of people are slaughtered, several times.

It may be depressing to consider, but you must take into account that Nanoha universe is still run by humans... they may come from a magical society... that does *not* make it perfect. It is human nature for some to be greedy, or want what they cannot or should not, or take liberties they should not.

We have no shortage of examples from in series to those whom have become corrupt even in the government, so imagine outside of it.

I imagine whole new ways to mug, rape, assault, steal, and make war, give torture, blackmail, coerce, and so on all exist. I can easily see magic being used for such. Consider the possibility of someone magically restraining someone, abducting or teleporting them, having their way with them (not nessecarily rape, maybe extract passwords, codes, corporate espianige), then erasing memories and placing back on the street.

And Remember, we may have a generally officially accepted Geneva convention on prisoner treatment on this planet, that does not state they do...
That's great that you have an active imagination. Now show me where this is taking place in the Nanohaverse. No one said their universe is perfect, but it damn well is better than the tech ruled Belkan era, and a damn sight better than our own planet. If you're trying to say they are worse then us, you still have a lot of work to do.

Again, you may want to take a look at SSX, to learn about a civil war taking place on the planet of Orussia, where all that death and rape is going on. Take a look at Force, where corporate shenanigans are happening. Take a look at StrikerS, where seedy elements in the Bureau are happening.

Oh wait... all that bad stuff has to do with normal tech, and magic has to come along to wipe tech's sorry butt and protect the populace. Again. If you wanna argue against magic, you might want to pick a different fandom. This one has a habit of showing just how good and useful magic is, and how it can be harnessed to provide a better society then we can get with tech alone.

Ahhh... but right or wrong, at least in the U.S., even with restrictions, you have that choice to make... this removes that choice. Which I do not feel is remotely fair to the lower half of society... but All but guarantees that the government cannot be taken out by a revolution.
How do you know the people of Mid-Childa can't own guns, for that matter? With the proper license, they can. The Bureau only controls mass-based weapons within itself, and on the worlds that have granted authority to the Bureau for that matter. And again, the Bureau doesn't even really rule. They merely help keep the peace and regulate lost logia.

I have to chuckle at the idea that guns in the hands of citizens are what keeps a government in check. It's a ridiculous argument in the US, and even more insane on Mid-Childa. A million people with rifles can do exactly jack and squat against a squad of mages.... or against a fleet of US drones.

No, sorry to burst your bubble, but neither the US nor MId-Childa's governments can be taken out by a revolution of people with guns. Any revolution will be fought solely on the basis of how much the military sides with the populace. Everything else is wishful thinking.

Shields can be pierced or overwhelmed or otherwise gotten around like with teleportation. A mix of strategic magic and conventional tactics and weaponry could devastate large swaths of area... take for example a sleep spell being used in some of the control centers and then them being bombed...
Incorrect. We saw this in A's. Barriers can jam teleportation, preventing people from teleporting in or out. You may wish to brush up on your source material. Much of what you have said thus far has been directly or indirectly countered by source material.

Bah... you would have to catch them doing it... with their ability to jump dimensions... unless it was witnessed, or it left some form of trace, how would you know. The threat of MAD only goes so far... I doubt there are many forces out there that could touch the TSAB.
The Huckbein and the Eclipse-infected say "hi!"

And it's called "communications" of which there are several ways. Also, when people investigate a planet that is no longer there, or is in pieces, the truth would eventually be found. As Sherlock Holmes once said, "There is no perfect crime; there are only imperfect investigations."

Ahhh... you are not looking at the concept war is about resources... the funding that would be lost would be at least in part made up for by conquering territories, better if you owed that territory money, as you would not need to pay it back.

In fact, in a interstellar magical environment, funding takes a whole new meaning when you can get funding and raw materials from asteroids and uninhabited planets.
Say hello to the Belkan wars. Which are something the Bureau was specifically founded to prevent ever happening again. The people who join, do so with the ideal of preventing that. In short, your wet dream of the Bureau doing such nasty stuff is exactly that: a dream.

Look, even if we buy your argument of "magic not safe!" ...where does that leave us? Magic is still the best thing around, and still leagues safer than any tech. And you still haven't offered any ideas that aren't already in play in the Nanohaverse. So, even if we buy your argument, it still gets us nowhere.
 

keroko

Well-Known Member
#87
PCHeintz72 said:
You and everyone else seem to be missing the concept that a normal object is always present, and as such a designation can be made of it, as it has existence of its own once made not really tied to anything else, even the maker. A pillow sitting on a bed is still there, it is not tied to my existence until someone picks it up...
I'm sorry, but since when is an object having its own existence a criteria for being called safe?

Hell, even if we do use that logic magic is totally harmless. On its own it does absolutely nothing until someone picks it up. Just like pillows, books, rocks, swords, guns, t-shirts, dice, DVD's, tanks, posters, atomic bombs etc.

For any given thing or action, the criteria for "safe" are more along the lines of "if it is used for its intended purpose, does it pose a risk of injury?" A pillow is a safe object, since sleeping on a pillow doesn't kill you. A kitchen knife is considered a relatively safe object, as when used for its intended purpose, it has a neglectable chance of causing injury, unless used improperly. A tazer is considered a risky object, as using it for its intended purpose -stunning people- does pose a statistically worrying chance of lasting injury even when used properly.

A magical stun blast has an insignificant chance of causing injury, thus it is considered "safe."
 

Gx Hero

Well-Known Member
#88
its amazing that the high council did something like that, jail scaglati. Pitty I doubt i taught the right lesson. But still where Jail failed the raptors from force succeed.

other wise I agree logicly it seems safe but how people will use it is something that logic can't predict.
 

Kaijo

Well-Known Member
#89
It's important to remember that the Brain council created Jail to recover and develop Al Hazard technologies, and they did so in secret because such they knew the Bureau has strict rules against the ethics of what Jail was engaged in, like the cyborgs. Modifying a baby, who cannot consent, is considered unethical. Raptors aren't human, though; they're robots. But the Brains, and Regius, did what they did because they didn't feel they could protect Mid-Childa and the Universe well enough. Still, Hayate (and Fate) worked for years to uncover the sneaky shit that was going on, and expose it so they could stop it.

That's what I mean about why the Bureau will always self-correct towards the better route. Because there are people like Hayate who join for the ideals the Bureau professes, and they won't let the Bureau stray from that.

Note that development of tech is still fine, as long as it is ethical. That is why the AEC weapons and Raptors are okay, but the Eclipse virus isn't. Biological weapons are generally verboten.
 

Gx Hero

Well-Known Member
#90
On you can't own guns thing is actually mentioned in sound stage X. Also Magic is more convenient money wise and effecientcy. A soldier is not gonna carry a handy bazoka, but may know divine buster. Also cost for the ammo is cut there fore more funding on other projects. Also no worry on reload even when you run out of cartrages.

and I agree about the brains. Considering being stuck in there unable to go outside literally might have clouded there judgement. Should be some sort of rule against making your self permanently part of your job.

though I find it funny you mention ec virus since the main ringleader seems to want to make more controllable for his own profit and integrate it into the military to gain it. Foolish villian
 

PCHeintz72

The Sentient Fanfic Search Engine mk II
#91
Regarding 'Safe' and magic...

My delay in response was caused by a combination of real life and myself actually asking a trusted uninvolved 3rd party member on this forum to evaluate the portion of the thread regarding the 'Safe' designation. Something I've only bothered to do perhaps two times before. I kind of liked the response, as it gave a angle I had not considered...

Boiling down the response... The argument is mainly "potential" (my view) vs. "intent" (the predominant view here).

'INTENT' matters IF, and only IF, you can control the wielders' intent, then it is 'safer'. But you can't. There's always going to be someone that misuses it. Hence the antagonists in the series.

'POTENTIAL' makes magic phenomenally unsafe due to the raw amount of power, whether considered environmentally safer than tech power or not. Most of the main 'good' characters, with their powers have the POTENTIAL to destroy large parts of a city, and even more in the case of Hayate, only their INTENT prevents it from happening.

That POTENTIAL does not change, but INTENT sure can be... not just on bad guys going to town, but even subverted good guys... consider how Hayate was manipulated by Graham as an example.

So, when it boils down, I am correct that magic is unsafe in it's POTENTIAL. Having a stun setting for magic means nothing if the user doesn't use it, then it becomes just as dangerous as tech. You guys are only partially correct in INTENT, since it can be subverted or even just not bothered with.


Regarding magic vs. tech (which I did not have my 3rd party give their opinion take or stance on)...

I've stated before in this very thread a person from a tech society will think tech is better, and one form a magic one would think magic is better...

If one does not have the other, neither view is flawed, as it is a matter of known vs. unknown quantity.

I know full well Midchildean society has both tech and magic... but that does not change the simple fact it is far more magically oriented than tech oriented... because of that I view and think of it more as a Magic based society with a slight fear of tech even if they use it.

And that thinking and the limiting of tech that is generally available is ultimately harmful to that society, regardless of whether one perceives their society to better or worse than various earth based ones... Tech is not inherently bad, magic is not inherently bad (note that is different in concept to implying it is truly 'safe' as some have stated).

There are even various fan fiction that goes into the mind sets of people that come from both sides of the coin viewing the other...

One example, whether you like the story or saga itself or not... 'Odyssey' by DrunkenGrognard. In that, he goes and shows the inner thoughts of characters like Picard and Chrono, at heir thoughts on Magic vs. tech... and how it baffles than a society could work on the other.
 

Kaijo

Well-Known Member
#92
You bring up an interesting line of debate with POTENTIAL vs. INTENT... but you don't seem to quite grasp how much worse tech is. A single nuke can have far worse consequences on the entire population of a planet, or even a bio-engineered virus that spreads through the air. Chemical, biological weapons, can have much more serious consequences than anything else. One virus released on one planet, and people leave that planet, spreading it elsewhere before it triggers... and bam, you've just eliminated a large chunk of humanity from the universe, either by death or quarantine.

Let me put your POTENTIAL into further clarification... say you have a nuke locked up on a safe. In one version of reality, you have only a few people with the key to that safe. Say, 10. Anyone of those ten can explode the nuke and cause devastation without the need of the others, because they can unlock the safe.

In another reality, you have the same nuke in the safe... but everyone has a key to it.

Which is safer? The one where 10 people have a key? Or the one where everyone has a key? Keeping in mind that it only takes one crackpot, or one person getting upset enough to go through with it. When you raise the number of people with access to the dangerous potential, you vastly increase the likelihood it will be used, and thus vastly increase the damage that will be caused.

Magic is 10 people. Tech is everyone, since as Erio points out, once a weapon is made, even a child can push a button. So the scale of potential for destruction will always be greater with tech. Thus, magic is safer. Not 100% safe, because nothing is... but safer because fewer people are around with the capability for great harm. That limits the damage they can do, and it is easier to keep track of a limited number of people with that power.

That's your argument's fatal weak point here, and what you don't quite understand about the Nanohaverse's version of magic (which is not the magic that other series use).

Of course, to make my analogy even more accurate... in that version with just 10 people having the key, the nuke also has the capability to stun, and not just destroy. With the other version, the nuke can only destroy. So statistics alone would then indicate that the 10 person version is safer, by that metric alone. There is a % chance that it will be used to stun, rather then destroy. With the "everyone has a key" version, there is a 100% chance the nuke will destroy when used.

One other aspect of this, is personal responsibility and recognition. As real studies have shown, when a person can remain anonymous, their limit for inflicting pain and other negative statuses on another human being goes up. It's easy to do bad shit if you know that you will never personally be fingered for it (we are all well aware of the internet troll syndrome). Since magic is tied to an individual, it also identifies them; it's not as easy to hide, so human nature would dictate that people would be less likely to abuse it. There is transformation magic, but there is magic to dispel that, too, and reveal the truth. Also, you can read a magic wavelength and match that to a person, as they did with Precia. If I'm the guy that released a contagion into the air, odds are good you'll never know it was me.

So, thus we can conclude that magic is safer by every metric. Yes, your argument that magic is not 100% safe is true. We acknowledge that. But your attempts to then rephrase it as "magic is just as dangerous as tech" have fallen flat thus far.

One last point, about your INTENT factor... with magic, at least, you can control intent. If you inspire mages with noble goals, they'll join your organization and use their powers for good. If you give them proper incentive, and make it attractive and provide training, they'll use their talents smartly and justly. The Bureau could have locked Hayate and the Wolks up forever... they didn't, and instead offered them a chance to do good. Just like our society, giving someone a positive outlet does wonders for keeping them on the straight and narrow. With tech, you have to do this for everyone... a far harder proposition. With magic in the Nanohaverse, you just have to do it for 10% of the population.
 

PCHeintz72

The Sentient Fanfic Search Engine mk II
#93
As I've stated several times, it has never been my goal to argue science vs. magic in regards to safety, I'm for both as needed... I merely disagreed in the extreme that magic in and of itself can be classed as 'safe'. Disregarding tech out of some fear of it is foolhardy, and closes doors that would otherwise be open.

Having said that... the nuclear bomb analogy is flawed, for a single reason.

You are not accounting for the checks and balances in place for someone to be able to 'push the button', codes, counter codes, joint agreement, unless all are in place... that bomb is not going to be launched.

Also, *normally* weapons on that scale are in the possession of governments, and extreme measures are taken to prevent other entities from having them.

Unlike nuclear reactors or even ships, there is quite literally *no* good reason for a non-government entity to have nuclear bombs. They cannot be used in construction, way to hazardous for demolitions, and ditto for nearly any other on-planet use. Now, that would change if we were to start mining asteroids in this solar system or base/planetary defense. I could well see a use for it then and could see corporations needing it to defend off planet holdings...

I see no such set of checks and balances on Magic... someone can wake up and say... wow I'm going to blow up part of the city today. Or be coerced, or be brainwashed or manipulated. INTENT is at the whimsy of the user....

Even if the TSAB responds and puts that person/persons down, they are not going to be able to do much on the initial onslaught...

And it is not '10 people' that can throw large scale destruction around. It is more. Even people whom can only say, blow up only intersections... put them at strategic points in the city... they can completely disable city response...

Take 9/11 terrorist acts, to say it could not have been done with Magic instead would be foolhardy indeed... blast a plane at the right moment, or attack the building directly by surprise, perhaps several buildings scattered, as was done 9/11 (people tend to forget it was 3 attacks in completely different areas of the country, not just the trade center, there was the PA incident and the pentagon incident).

EDIT:

One last point, about your INTENT factor... with magic, at least, you can control intent. If you inspire mages with noble goals, they'll join your organization and use their powers for good. If you give them proper incentive, and make it attractive and provide training, they'll use their talents smartly and justly. The Bureau could have locked Hayate and the Wolks up forever... they didn't, and instead offered them a chance to do good. Just like our society, giving someone a positive outlet does wonders for keeping them on the straight and narrow. With tech, you have to do this for everyone... a far harder proposition. With magic in the Nanohaverse, you just have to do it for 10% of the population.
This I disagree with on general principal... you are implying people with be just and noble and right thinking because it can be offered to them...

People as a whole are *not* all noble... People are power hungry and people are belief driven, and if the power offered is not enough, or those beliefs differ from what the system offers... you get bad guys, even in the government itself...

And before you say nanohaverse is different... I suggest you look at just what the series has shown us in regards to corruption of people raised by the Midchildean system, people in the government, taking on black projects and working behind its back and even against it...

I do not want to dig deeper in that direction, from the standpoint fans of this series tend to dislike discussing this aspect and prefer to think the TSAB as good guys.
 

keroko

Well-Known Member
#94
At this point it should be interesting to note that Erio said relatively safe and clean.
 

Andarion

Well-Known Member
#95
PCHeintz72 said:
As I've stated several times, it has never been my goal to argue science vs. magic in regards to safety, I'm for both as needed... I merely disagreed in the extreme that magic in and of itself can be classed as 'safe'. Disregarding tech out of some fear of it is foolhardy, and closes doors that would otherwise be open.
One thing is, people who can throw around powerful magic are not infew. There are probably hundreds if not thousands of them, true. But that Pales in comparison to thousands, hundreds of thousands or milions of people who could use gun and IEDs to really screw people over. There are simply too few powerful magic users to really be a threat, most of them are probably accounted for. I bet the Mid-Childa scans kids for potential and the likes when they start going to school.

Also one little thing to do. You are forgetting about mentality. It's really not a case of whether dropping science is rational or not. It's because Mid and many others planets are friggin afraid of the Mass-based weaponry. They spent the last thousand years fighting a big horrible war which led to destruction of countless planets and deaths of millions of people. They are just plain terrified by the very notion that something like that might happen again. It's like with Europe, the two World Wars were so horrible that Europe has been scared straight and it's been behaving nicely ever since.
 

Gx Hero

Well-Known Member
#96
I think Belka is the example world of all this considering their history of war fare and how dangerous their weapons were. Even the soundstage mentions it. Even the ixeplla and her power to turn the dead into marriage is quite frightening.
 

Kaijo

Well-Known Member
#97
PCHeintz72 said:
Having said that... the nuclear bomb analogy is flawed, for a single reason.

You are not accounting for the checks and balances in place for someone to be able to 'push the button', codes, counter codes, joint agreement, unless all are in place... that bomb is not going to be launched.

Also, *normally* weapons on that scale are in the possession of governments, and extreme measures are taken to prevent other entities from having them.
Wrong. Suitcase nuke. Or cargo container nuke. Sail it into a harbor and remote-detonate it. When the USSR collapsed, Russia lost several nuclear weapons. Or rather, they are unaccounted for. Pakistan is in a very precarious position right now, where Islamists are fairly close to toppling that government. In either case, that means nukes in the hands of people who wouldn't have anything against using said weapons.

Oh, did I mention Pakistan's top scientist sold nuke data to everyone who wants it, including North Korea who is developing them now?

This is what I mean about putting dangerous capability into the hands of anyone who wants it. It is VERY possible, even today, for a single person to set off a nuke.

And if you don't like a nuke in the example, then replace it with a bottle of anthrax, sarin gas, nerve gas, some new virus, etc. One of the worries about Syria, is their stocks of biological and chemical weapons falling into the hands of radicals... something that wouldn't be much of an issue if Syria had mages instead. So, as you see, your assertions are quite wrong in the face of reality. Or maybe you'll continue to believe that, until a religiously-motivated suicide bomber decides to stand next to you, smile, and then open his canister of nerve gas.

Unlike nuclear reactors or even ships, there is quite literally *no* good reason for a non-government entity to have nuclear bombs. They cannot be used in construction, way to hazardous for demolitions, and ditto for nearly any other on-planet use. Now, that would change if we were to start mining asteroids in this solar system or base/planetary defense. I could well see a use for it then and could see corporations needing it to defend off planet holdings...
Then you miss one of the basic things man does: make war. If I don't like you because you don't believe in my god, or I want your resources, then I'll use whatever I have to wage war on you.

You want to talk about checks and balances on magic, and yet miss these very vital LACK of checks and balances on tech like nukes and chemical/biological weapons, and man's very nature?

And it is not '10 people' that can throw large scale destruction around. It is more. Even people whom can only say, blow up only intersections... put them at strategic points in the city... they can completely disable city response...
It was an analogy. But we can say 100 if you want... which is the number of ace of aces-level mages around, the ones with powers like Nanoha. There is roughly another 1000 A to AAA ranks, which are normal Aces. These are the ones with the power you are so afraid of. And then tens of thousands of C to B ranks most likely, but those have very little power; nowhere near the destructive power of the top ranks.

For comparison, Earth has 7 billion on it. So the number of mages doesn't even approach 10% of our population. It doesn't even reach 1%.

And hell, you wanna talk safeties? The Cradle, the most powerful magitek battleship of the Belkan wars... could only be activated by a living, breathing Saint. One person. Nukes? Everybody (or need I tell you about the many planets rendered uninhabitable due to nuke-like weapons in the Belkan wars?) Cradle? One person. That's less than 10. It required Jail take extreme measures and have things go his way in order to activate it.

Fun fact: There is always a guy around the US president carrying a briefcase they call the "football." This contains the secure communication console to launch the country's nukes. It's there in case the president needs to make such an order on a moment's notice (more important during the cold war). The president himelf carries the launch codes, which are called the "biscuit."

Did you know that both the biscuit and football have been misplaced and lost? Not just for minutes or hours... but for days and months? That's right, the ability to destroy a good chunk of the planet, had been lost and could have ended up in the hands of who knows what.

That's right, with tech, pure accident can destroy the world. Read about some nuclear screw-ups that you won't believe we survived. And then then read about the greatest human hero in history, who is responsible for saving for your life. He was a Russian second-in-command, who is credited with preventing nuclear war, when he had every reason to start it. His name is Vasili Arkhipov.

If you knew just how often our civilization had come close to wiping itself out, or starting a nuclear war, you'd shit your pants and run happily to the TSAB. I can pull out more, if you like, because the Cuban Missile Crisis wasn't the only time we got damn close.

This I disagree with on general principal... you are implying people with be just and noble and right thinking because it can be offered to them...

People as a whole are *not* all noble... People are power hungry and people are belief driven, and if the power offered is not enough, or those beliefs differ from what the system offers... you get bad guys, even in the government itself...
I suggest you look across the world at organizations like the Red Cross, which do inspire people to act better and take risks to help others. There are many more like it, that I could spend quite a bit of time listing. The EFF. Reporters without borders. Doctors without borders. ACLU.

There are many noble people in this world who brave dangers that would make you crap your pants. You sit in the comfort of your own home and type away at the computer. Would you go into a war zone to find injured people and get them to treatment? Can't imagine doing that, right? Can't believe anyone would be so noble as to leave all the comforts they have and do that. But there are real heroes out there who do. If you honestly can't believe in the betterment of humanity, than I honestly pity you.
 

Gx Hero

Well-Known Member
#98
I agree, mainly because I am tired of the multichapter stories where the aces are at war with each other like the BetrayerS manga, or something else. Magic is easier to check and balance even if it has its own unique problems since not everyone is going to be able to cast the unique spells like inviolability, illusion unless they study, haha study I doubt midchilda kids like school any more than earth kids do.

In short Kaijo is correct. THough I think that religous and faith diffrences are the hardest thing for the TSab to deal with, but probaly as technology advances and people get use to it with each geneeration and incorperate their religions into it, mostly, that their is less chance for conflict. Not an absolute regreatbly. after all mass based weapons aren't the only problem.

as Mildardo peace craft from gundam Wing said. To achieve total peace all weapons must be eliminated, and the desire to fight must be erased from peoples minds.

An impossible task, but magic helps ease it since neither terrorist, or politicians have mass based weapons, and the aces have wills of their own, which only eases it not erases the problem. Regius being one in a million to cause a stir.


Before I confuse every one with more rambling here is what I think the Tsab requires for membership.


A certain level of technology magic or non.

A united world government

the abolishment of mass weapons

rights to the people of certain kinds.


This is mainly to keep politicians and others from using lost logia or too advanced tech to create weapons or for personal use. And if half the world doesn't want to join you be giving tech to people who may make weapons that were haven forbid destructive. Plus stability. Plus if magic is a cleaner source of energy it makes the use of other types less likely after all why drill for gas that is limited when you can make magic energy cheaper, and do more with it.
 

PCHeintz72

The Sentient Fanfic Search Engine mk II
#99
You want to talk about checks and balances on magic, and yet miss these very vital LACK of checks and balances on tech like nukes and chemical/biological weapons, and man's very nature?
Checks and balances, while never perfect, are at least in place...

Would I want them better, absolutely... do I want a complete abolishment... absolutely not.

A nuclear bomb is a valuable tool... it can be used for good (ex. blowing up asteroids or system defense) or evil (ex. potential terrorist acts or as currently employed to strike against fellow humans)... the problem has always been man, not the device.

And if you don't like a nuke in the example, then replace it with a bottle of anthrax, sarin gas, nerve gas, some new virus, etc.
No... nerve agents I agree have no use... they could not likely be used against aliens for example, as we have no clue if they would even be affected since we would not know their biology.

Like spells, once ugly evil destructive spells are known, they cannot really be made unknown... or to use an old saying... you cannot put the genie back in the bottle.

One of the worries about Syria, is their stocks of biological and chemical weapons falling into the hands of radicals... something that wouldn't be much of an issue if Syria had mages instead.
A group of captured and potentially brainwashed or worse rogue mages vs. chemical weapons? There is a nasty tossup... I'm not seeing a benefit of one over the other.

So, as you see, your assertions are quite wrong in the face of reality. Or maybe you'll continue to believe that, until a religiously-motivated suicide bomber decides to stand next to you, smile, and then open his canister of nerve gas.
Versus a motivated or rogue or brainwashed mage?

Did you know that both the biscuit and football have been misplaced and lost? Not just for minutes or hours... but for days and months? That's right, the ability to destroy a good chunk of the planet, had been lost and could have ended up in the hands of who knows what.
I remember reading about it.

There are many noble people in this world who brave dangers that would make you crap your pants. You sit in the comfort of your own home and type away at the computer. Would you go into a war zone to find injured people and get them to treatment? Can't imagine doing that, right? Can't believe anyone would be so noble as to leave all the comforts they have and do that. But there are real heroes out there who do. If you honestly can't believe in the betterment of humanity, than I honestly pity you.
I know full well of such organizations... I did not state there are no noble humans out there, nor was I belittling such august organizations.

The existence of such organizations, or individuals, does *not* negate what I said in that most of humanity, even in Nanohaverse, is motivated by their wants, their desires... Precia, Jail, a couple corrupt generals... there is *plenty* of evidence given that despite being from a different planet, from a pure morals and human desires standpoint, they are *no different from us*.

Whether you talk magic or tech, it can be used by good or bad people... whether you talk forbidden items... or illegal items... bad people can get them...



A certain level of technology magic or non.

A united world government

the abolishment of mass weapons

rights to the people of certain kinds.
I can agree to 1 and 4...

2 I can agree to as long as we can count instead a united extra solar system front. For example, if the Earth collected all non-solar system politics under a single umbrella, say a expanded UN. or say UN. Spacey as called by in Robotech or Project Ako. And we should be guaranteed sovereignty in our solar system, and be informed of any clandestine operation infringing on our soil... Otherwise it would be no different than submitting ourselves to their whimsy. This would make the TSAB something like the AHB from Crest/Banner of the Stars...

3 I cannot agree to... that is stupidity, we would be giving up an ability and turning our back on a tool... No argument in this thread has yet convinced me otherwise.
 

Azure

Well-Known Member
About the mass weapon thing, remember that the galactic setting the TSAB faces is a post-apocalyptic world, one that rose due to the fallout of the Belkan Wars, they basically nuked themselves to death (but I am sure that the Marrigage, the Book of Darkness, Eclipse and all those dooms day Lost Logia) to them banning mass weapons was probably the best way to stop these things from happening again. Magic is probably better because it has a stun setting, and that is useful for a peace keeping organization.

It might be a good idea to compare how efficient mass weapons are compared to magic? Probably one of the reasons it is so used, is because in the end magic ended being more efficient in both cost and power, in comparison with mass weapons.

Also not everyone agrees with the fact that magic is better, hell Force is in part about this. It questions if magic has any right to be used by TSAB as a peace keeping tool if it is just going to be rendered useless by AMF and other anti-magic tools. Hell, Eclipse experiments were started with the goal to just find an alternate energy source that was not magic,(probably to not fall to the dangers of AMFs). Hell, TSAB is even starting to use mass weapons (such as railguns, plasma piles and cannons) in limited quantities with the AEC weapons programs (and part of the objectives of this is probably to be able to minimize the AEC weapons to include them into devises. The goal is probably to give any device an AEC mode to deal with AMF conditions with little problem).

About the whole world goverment, I think it is not that dumb. To stand at the galactic stage and form part of the TSAB, I do think that most worlds should have a world government, even if it is something like the UN that stands as a coalition of multiple countries in a single world.

PCHeintz, can I ask you a question? I think part of the reason you dislike the TSAB is because you feel they act without consulting the Earth's authority and just do whatever they want in our territory in clandestine manners. Is this right?

Another question... do you think the Earth as it is can negotiate with a group like the TSAB as an equal? Please answer me... I am curious of your opinion.
 
Top